Uncategorized

Dynasty Debate: DeSean Jackson vs. Kendall Wright

JacksonandWright

Thanks to the hard work of our own Ryan McDowell, we have some interesting ADP data to analyze.  After February’s information was posted, I went through some of the rankings and picked players who had close draft positions.  I presented a couple of the pairings to fellow writer Chad Scott and after several attempts we found two players we disagreed on.  To be fair, I would happily take either side in this fight and I think a solid case could be made for both guys.  The two players we will debate are Kendall Wright (ADP 85) and DeSean Jackson (ADP 90).

Chad’s Take

I’d like to open my argument by stating the players’ physical attributes.

Kendall Wright is 5’10”, 196 pounds while DeSean Jackson is 5’10”, 178 pounds and I think that is being generous.  Wright looks like an actual NFL wide receiver, but Jackson not so much.  He also has a good three year age difference on Jackson.  DJax has missed a total of nine games in his five year career and has been knocked out of four more games.  His body isn’t meant to take the weekly punishment in the NFL.  Owners fear for his safety whenever the diminutive receiver is hit.

What he lacks in size, he more than makes up for in speed and confidence.  He’s probably the best receiver in the league, if you ask him.  Whenever the ball’s in his hands, he’s a threat to take it all the way.  He’s one of the most electric players the NFL has to offer, yet I’m not sold on him in a Chip Kelly offense.  I do, however, think his per game numbers will increase, but I highly doubt he’ll be able to play a full season with the added exposure he will get.

Wright, on the other hand, has an NFL ready body that can take punishment if the defenders can catch him.  Like Jackson, Wright is able to take the top off of defenses on any given play.  I love him going forward in dynasty leagues and that’s why I chose him.

Wright quietly had a solid rookie season by leading the Titans in both targets (95) and receptions (64) despite missing one game.  He cracked his ribs in week 15 against the Jets and sat out the next week versus the Packers.  I’m pretty sure Jackson would have missed half the season if he had the same injury.

Wright was utilized in the screen game and short-to-intermediate routes – not exactly what he was drafted for after being taken in the first round with the 20th overall pick in last year’s NFL Draft.  The speedster from Baylor was more accustomed to the deep ball during his college tenure, but developed into more of a possession receiver in 2012.  Much of that had to do with his quarterbacks, Jake Locker and Matt Hasselbeck.

Locker’s left shoulder popped out of place during the season opener and again in week four, causing the 2011 first round pick to miss five games.  He came back in week ten, but admitted he was never very comfortable for the duration of the season.  Locker has never been a very accurate passer going back to his days at the University of Washington.  In 2011, in limited duty, Locker completed just over 51% of his passes.  In 2012, he upped that number to just over 56%.  Locker has a strong arm, but was rarely asked to throw the ball downfield.  He had just 49 attempts of 20 yards or more (QB24), but was accurate on 40.8% of those throws (QB15).

Locker had surgery on his non-throwing shoulder in early January, which should give him plenty of time to rehabilitate and get ready for the off-season workouts.  Wright played much better when Hasselbeck was his quarterback.  During the weeks Hasselbeck was the starter, Wright was the WR32 or a startable WR3.  During the weeks with Locker, he was the WR57 or barely worth a bench spot.

Wright and Locker will need to get on the same page this off-season as soon as Locker is ready to throw.  Offensive coordinator Dowell Loggains has already come out and said the offense will be simplified for Locker by taking the “less is more” approach.  The effect Loggains will have on the offense will be significant to the fantasy value of the Titans’ passing game.  The former quarterbacks coach will utilize Locker’s talents far better than the man he took over for, Chris Palmer, by rolling him out and allowing him to throw the ball downfield more frequently. For this to happen, the Titans will have to fix the offensive line this off-season via the draft or free agency which is something to keep tabs on.

What it comes down to me is opportunity and the opportunity to get injured.  I think both will have plenty of opportunities to make big fantasy contributions to your fake football teams in 2013 and beyond, but am confident Wright will outlast Jackson from an injury perspective.

Both have reasonable ADPs.  Wright sits at 85.9 while Jackson is being taken around 90.83.  Give me the younger, bigger receiver who has shown he can have increased value in a PPR format.  The opportunity is going to be there – it’s up to him and his quarterback to seize it.

Mark’s Take

Kendall Wright is a promising young receiver and likely has a bright NFL career ahead of him.  He’s in a decent situation with a clearly defined role, but he lacks a legitimate quarterback.  Wright’s value is partially dependent on the ability of Jake Locker to improve or the Titans ability to upgrade the quarterback situation in the near future.  He was billed as a dynamic open field threat with enormous yards after the catch potential.  Unfortunately, he ranked #29 in the league with an average 5.2 yards after the catch – that isn’t going to cut it for player who is only 5’9” and weighs just 196 lbs.  He lacks long speed (4.61 40) and will need to improve his open field playmaking moving forward to make an impact for your fake team.  He looked more like a possession receiver in his rookie season and unless he is getting a huge volume of targets, the upside is limited.

DeSean Jackson has been in the league since 2008 and has led his team in receiving yards every season except for his injury shortened 2012 campaign.  The first two seasons of his career he had Donovan McNabb throwing to him and he tallied over 2,000 yards and 11 touchdowns.  During Michael Vick’s renaissance year, he racked up another 1,000 yard season with six more touchdowns.  Like most of the Eagles’ offense, his numbers plummeted with Vick’s regression and injuries.  In short, he’s been a consistent contributor with legitimate quarterback play.

That’s all well and good, but 1,000 yards and five touchdowns aren’t unattainable totals for Wright by any stretch.  So, why am I buying DeSean Jackson over Kendall Wright?

First, Jackson has proven to be a big play threat while Wright’s biggest play was 38 yards – that’s pretty simple.

Secondly, Chip Kelly should breathe some fresh air into the Eagles offense. Kelly took over as head coach for the Oregon Ducks in 2009.  He went on to lead some of the most explosive offenses College football has ever seen.  The year he took over, Oregon running backs averaged 5.5 yards per carry and they averaged six yards or more over his final two seasons.  The wide receivers averaged at least 11 yards per catch during his tenure.  The closest thing he had to a true number one receiver was Jeff Maehl in 2009 and 2010 – Maehl had over 1,000 yards and 12 touchdowns in his final season as a Duck.

Kelly’s offense is based primarily on two things – speed and getting the ball to playmakers in space.  He does this by spreading out the defense through three and four receiver sets and utilizing a running quarterback. This style forces defenders to process a large amount of information in a fraction of a second.  If the plan works out, defenders hesitate, resulting in open space for offensive playmakers. The Eagles’ two most explosive open field threats are LeSean McCoy and Jackson.  I expect both to have bounce back seasons in 2013 with featured roles.

Most recently, Kelly’s featured players have been LaMichael James and Kenjon Barner.  James is 5’8” and 194 lbs and Barner is 5’11” and 193 lbs.  DeSean Jackson is 5’10” and weighs 175 pounds.  Jackson ran the fastest forty of the three and fits the mold of a featured player in the quick tempo offense.  I recognize Jackson doesn’t play the running back position, but you saw what Kelly’s system did for Maehl.

Jackson has averaged an astounding 17.5 yards per catch over his career or about eight more yards than Wright’s rookie campaign. He won’t likely see the deep ball as often, but he should see significantly more opportunities with space.  I can envision Vick or Dennis Dixon, McCoy and Jackson all lined up in the backfield at times with Jackson seeing a handful of rushing attempts each week.  Due to increased snaps for the entire offense and a featured role moving forward, 80 catches and about 50 carries sounds attainable.  Assuming he averaged at least 15 yards per catch and five yards per carry (slightly less than the average for those position at Oregon under Kelly), that comes out to 1,450 total yards.  Mix in five to seven touchdowns and you have a borderline WR1 moving forward.

Conclusion

Chad and I set out to debate which player would be the better pick in the 85-90 range of dynasty drafts.  I don’t know if either one of us won the debate, but I think we did a nice job laying out pros and cons of each player.  In summary, Chad’s buying the solid build and relatively safe situation Wright has fallen into.  He’s relying on improvement at the quarterback position with the addition of a new offense coordinator.  I’m buying the riskier upside of DeSean Jackson.  I’m counting on a feature role in a fast paced Chip Kelly offense and good health.  Ultimately, you have to decide for yourself, but I hope this helps if you’re on the clock with a tough decision to make.

18 Comments

18 Comments

  1. Kevin DeSmedt

    March 19, 2013 at 5:37 am

    Actually own both players. Love Kendall longterm, and acquired DJax this offseason because I thought/think he’s way under valued. He’s a fairly known commodity that certainly won’t hurt you as a WR3/4, with significant upside.

    • Mark Rockwell

      March 19, 2013 at 5:55 am

      I argued for DJax, but own Wright. I still really like him. His YAC and lack of big plays bothered me. However, I think an underrated part of YAC is QB ball placement. They need to put the ball in a place where the WR can make a play and we all know Locker struggles with accuracy.

      • Michael Casinghino

        March 19, 2013 at 7:01 am

        Well said. As someone who watched everyone of Crabtree’s games; he didn’t have any run after catch with Alex Smith throwing him the ball because he usually had to adjust to it and it took longer to get there.

  2. Kevin DeSmedt

    March 19, 2013 at 6:06 am

    For sure. Also, a lot of the buzz around Kendall coming out, and the numerous Steve Smith comparisons, focussed on his ball skills. He has a 40 inch vert and was a stud basketball player. Not only can he take the top of a d, but he can go up and get it when need be. Hopefully we see that this year.

  3. kcDemonSlayer

    March 19, 2013 at 8:17 am

    Chip Kelly’s uptempo system worked in college against slow, undersized PAC 12 defense’s. NFL guys are bigger and cover more ground a lot faster and actually jam receivers off the line…especially undersized receivers. I’m excited to see Chip Kelly get busy this year but I don’t think he will have the kind of success that he had in college…especially with an old dog like Vick under center…..no pun intended.

    • Mark Rockwell

      March 19, 2013 at 8:59 am

      There are a lot of reasons his system might not work in the NFL, but like you said I’m excited to see him try.

  4. tebow

    March 19, 2013 at 10:34 am

    i think Jackson has more talent and is one of my favorite players to watch but i think you can get KW for a lot cheaper…well at least in my league so i rather pay cheaper for a guy that might put up similar numbers than for a guy that already has an established name. If Britt can stop getting hurt/suspended it will help Wright by getting the lesser corner. They need to run more play action with CK2 and get Kendall down the field.

  5. SJ

    March 19, 2013 at 11:05 am

    Give the option: I’ll always choose the featured player over the non-featured in a given offense. So that makes my pick for DJax easy here, well, for as long as Britt is on the Titans at least.

    Long-term, Wright is interesting but the same could be said about DJax as he’s still relatively young. I dont try to look past the next 3-4 years (if that long) in dynasty, given how much change and uncertainty can happen.

    What worries me with Wright is just like others have said on here, he really played more like a possession receiver than a big-play dynamo. No one ever confuses Jackson with a possession guy, so I like the big possibilities he brings to the table, even if he never lives up to it.

  6. Alan Bauerle

    March 19, 2013 at 1:00 pm

    All great points. Wright had to get his feet wet this past season. If he keeps up at this rate by year 3 he will have a the oppertunity to become a stud. 65 catches from shakey qb play is not a bad number. I feel like he can become a hybrid possesion/ deep ball guy. Once Locker improves his play KW’s numbers will. just go up. Nate Robinsons time in the sun is almost up and as long as KW play doesn’t regress he should see plenty of wr2 reps. DJax no doubt is a good player but his qb situation isn’t much better..I would love to see what would happen if KW played w a top 10 qb. Would be interesting.

  7. John Giles

    March 19, 2013 at 5:25 pm

    Jackson isn’t the best receiver in Philly, in my opinion. I think Macklin is better. Definitely Wright.

    • Mark Rockwell

      March 19, 2013 at 6:17 pm

      As far as being the best wr I agree. Maclin is more well rounded. He is bigger and better route runner. I was looking at more explosive and who fits the Kelly scheme better and I still think that’s Jackson.

      One could also argue Wright isn’t the best WR in Tennessee. Debatable I guess.

    • Mike D

      March 19, 2013 at 6:50 pm

      Neither Maclin or Jackson is a #1 WR in the NFL. For fantasy, at least with Jackson you know you’re getting a one-trick pony. I have no idea why Maclin gets so overrated each season. With the two guys in Philly you know what you’re getting, so depending on what your team needs, I’d take a shot on Wright over both them because of upside.

  8. TTT

    March 20, 2013 at 6:31 am

    I think the whole issue about Wright being a possession receiver is really a moot point considering where he was drafted. You don’t take a guy in the 1st round to just sit and be a possession receiver his whole career. There has even been talk that TEN will draft a slot receiver so Wright can play the outside.

    Jackson is great as a WR 3/4 like people have said because he can put up huge games for you, but that’s the problem. He’s pretty inconsistent. He scored something like 50% of his points in 3 games. Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to have him as say a WR4 that I could plug in when need be. I just don’t know if the Chip Kelly offense will make him any less consistent.

    Even with Locker, the talk of new OC in TEN is to play a system that fits the players. That would mean Locker throwing quite a few deep balls, which Wright has the athleticism to go up and get. Not to mention I don’t think Wright is quite the injury risk that Jackson is. Wright has high WR2 potential, but, like anything else, that’s just an opinion. People will agree or disagree, but that’s what makes it fun.

    • TTT

      March 20, 2013 at 8:08 am

      *inconsistent

  9. Sensei John Kreese

    March 20, 2013 at 9:20 am

    I think that it is pretty obvious that Fitzpatrick will be starting by week 8. I’ll take Wright, but I like both this year.

  10. German Cowboys

    March 20, 2013 at 10:37 am

    IMO, it comes down to how is the makeup of your team and what are you looking for , when you have to decide between DeSean Jackson and K. Wright.

    i only would consider one of them for depth, to fil in , to manage bye-weeks, etc. but never to start on weekly basis.

    DeSean Jackson was too inconsistent in the past , i think it was enough said about his talent, speed, injury-risk etc. i believe the only thing is going for Jackson right now to be on fantasy radar, is the Chip Kelly factor.

    Kendall Wright showed some flashes in his rookie season, i believe his talent and skills are good fit for the Titans, he could be used in different ways, as a possession, on the slot or even on the outside. If we assume that Britt will finally step up healthy enough and show up according to his talent and skills and with the help of more consistent running game by adding S. Greene to pair with CJ to give the Titans more options with the help of a better play-calling and the assumption that Locker or Fitzpatrick could play like an NFL-QB should play, then i prefer K. Wright over Jackson for the upside Wright gives me, as i do not buy too much into the Chip Kelly factor and as i still see the Eagles with too many holes.

    K. Wright would be the player i would consider as one whom i could roster on my bench to wait and see, if he breaks out fine , if not, no harm done. Wright comes with some risk. He is no player right now to be considered a starter.

  11. homepage

    March 26, 2014 at 3:23 pm

    Target Characteristics: These are characteristics that reference the one that receives and operations a message.
    Opioids offers short, intermediate and longer lasting analgesia, based upon the particular properties
    from the medication (( An opioid can be a chemical that work well by
    binding to opioid receptors, that happen to be found principally within the nervous system and also the gastrointestinal tract.

    ISRO has in the past built many field installations and works together with all the international space research
    community on many important bilateral and multilateral research
    agreements.

  12. viagra dans le domaine public

    March 26, 2014 at 4:02 pm

    I’m really loving the theme/design of your blog. Do you ever run into any internet
    browser compatibility issues? A couple of my blog audience
    have complained about my blog not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Safari.

    Do you have any solutions to help fix this problem?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top