Editor’s Note: We’ve received messages for years asking for coverage of medical issues facing the NFL and fantasy football owners. We’re excited to unveil this article today and also to introduce a new mailbag of sorts. ”The Dynasty Doctor” will be a series we run on an as needed basis. If you have any questions in regards to concussions, ACL procedures, recovery times from specific injuries or anything else related to medical science, submit your question here and it may be featured in an upcoming article with our own resident M.D., Dr. Scott Peak. He’s a board certified neurologist, neuro-oncologist and is the Director of Neuro-Oncology in the Department of Neuroscience/Neurosurgery for a large health care system.
The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has received a lot of attention recently, both in the NFL and in fantasy football. Years ago, a torn ACL was a career-killer for an NFL athlete. More recently, we have seen several athletes return from an ACL tear and perform at a high level. Wes Welker. Willis McGahee. Adrian Peterson. The question then becomes, how are these athletes able to overcome such a previously devastating injury? Peter G asked this question in our first installment of the Dynasty Doctor column, and it is a great one. In this article, we will discuss an ACL injury, describe what an ACL is, how it is repaired, and lastly rehabilitation for it. We will also compare and contrast it with Achilles injuries for NFL players.
The ACL is a ligament that helps stabilize the knee joint against anterior and internal rotational force. The ACL is about 3 to 4 cm long and 5 to 10 mm thick. The exact size and angle of an ACL varies in subtle but important ways for each person, and that can impact surgical results. The ACL is in the middle of the knee, and attaches to the femur (upper leg) and tibia (lower leg). The insertion points can also vary in size, anywhere from less than 14 mm to more than 18 mm on the tibia. The ACL is made up of two parts, an anteromedial (AM) and a posterolateral portion (PL). The AM part helps stabilize anteriorly directed force on the tibia, while the PL part stabilizes internal rotational force in the knee joint.
An ACL injury is diagnosed on examination and with imaging. There are two common tests done to examine a patient with a torn ACL:
- Anterior Drawer’s Test: The patient lays flat on a table, knee bent at a 90 degree angle, the examiner places his/her hands behind the lower leg, and pulls forward. If the leg moves forward more than 5 mm, a torn ACL is suspected.
- Lachman’s Test: The patient lays down flat or sits up, the knee is bent to a 30 degree angle, and the lower leg is pulled forward. If the lower leg shifts forward farther than the uninjured lower leg, that is a positive test result and suspicious for a torn ACL.
The reason why both tests can diagnose an ACL injury is that, at both a 90 degree angle in the Anterior Drawer’s Test or a 30 degree angle in the Lachman’s test, the ACL should be tense and resist forward motion of the lower leg. The ACL will stabilize the knee joint in this position, and if the ACL is completely torn, the lower leg will shift forward more than it should. Not surprisingly, this can result in significant instability in the knee joint when athletes attempt to play a sport like football.
An MRI can be done, and is able to detect the injury in 90 to 95% of cases. Advances in imaging have definitely improved diagnosis of an ACL injury, as MRI machines were first available in the 1980’s. Before 1980, clinical examinations were the best means of finding it.
Surgery is the first step in the treatment of a torn ACL.
An important tenet of orthopedic surgery is to reconstitute normal anatomy as much as possible. After all, our bodies are a system of levers, and movements depend on precisely located muscles, tendons and ligaments. If ligaments are replaced in a manner that is not as close as possible to normal anatomy, movements after surgery will not be precise. An athlete will have their own unique ACL size and angle of insertion in the joint. It is important for an orthopedic surgeon to replace the torn ligament in a manner that closely replicates the original position of the ACL.
So, how have surgical techniques come along to improve ACL recovery for athletes?
In the recent past, torn ACLs were replaced in a ‘non-anatomic’ manner. As early as 2003, such surgeries were being performed using this technique. A non-anatomic graft is when an orthopedic surgeon inserts the new ACL in a position that does not precisely match original anatomy of the ligament. These grafts tend to be more vertical in orientation, and this changed the normal movement in the knee joint. The results were often meniscal tears, arthritis or a re-rupture of the graft after surgery.
A graft is the replacement ACL tendon, and can come from two sources. An autograft is a tendon that comes from the patient, usually taken from the patella or hamstring tendons. An allograft is taken from a cadaver. Autografts are generally preferred for athletes, as they are associated with a faster recovery and lower re-rupture rate compared to cadaver grafts. This is an advance that has helped improve recovery from a torn ACL.
Surgical placement of grafts has evolved considerably, and within the past decade surgical technique has improved quite a bit. Surgeries are now done using an ‘anatomic’ approach. This basically means that grafts are placed in a manner that replicates the original location of the ACL, specifically for each patient. This results in joint movements that are more natural, and hence lower risk of arthritis, meniscal tears or re-rupture of the graft. Even the grafts themselves are becoming more advanced. There are now ‘double-bundle’ grafts, and these more closely replicate the anatomy of an ACL, with AM and PL components. Thus, ‘double-bundle’ grafts, according to recent studies, may improve joint stability with both anterior and internal rotational force compared to single ‘non-anatomic’ grafts.
Surgical skills have also improved given the sheer number of cases. There are 50-60 torn ACLs per year in the NFL, and 200,000 ACL injuries per year in the United States, the majority of which are associated with athletic activity. Compare that to only five torn Achilles tendons per year in the NFL. NFL players benefit even more, as they are referred to famed orthopedic surgeons like Dr. James Andrews, who has performed over 40,000 surgeries in his career. Surgical skills are honed, and complications reduced, with more cases. NFL players benefit because they get the best possible surgeons with the most experience, and that helps them recover faster.
Once surgery is finished, rehabilitation becomes the next important step.
Rehabilitation techniques, like surgery, have improved over the years. Players used to be immobilized, non-weight bearing for 4 to 6 weeks or longer after an ACL surgery, but things have changed. Players will now be on crutches with an immobilizer two or three days after surgery. An immobilizer is basically a very large brace that prevents the knee joint from moving, but is removable to allow for gentle physical therapy. Players are typically off crutches at four weeks, running in 2-3 months, and may even return to play in six to nine months. It is important to get players mobile soon after surgery, as muscles can atrophy if kept non-weight bearing for too long. NFL players who were non-weight bearing for long periods of time, in the old days, had to overcome disuse atrophy in surrounding leg muscles, and this added to their list of problems, complicating their recovery.
Rehabilitation also includes modernized techniques to essentially retrain the athlete on how to use their repaired knee joint properly. Proprioception is a complex sensation, and it is the ability for a brain to understand where its body is in space. For example, if you close your eyes, extend your arms out, then touch your nose, that can be done because of proprioception. The way athletes land from a jump is an automatic function, almost like a reflex. Athletes who tend to use ‘valgus landings’ are at higher risk for ACL tears. A valgus landing is when the knee is bent inward, like being ‘knocked-kneed.’ For some athletes, this is how their body reacts to jumping, and unfortunately for them, it places them at higher risk for ACL injuries. If the knee is in a valgus position upon landing from a jump, the leg is extended fully, and this places a huge stress on an ACL, possibly tearing it. This is also why 70% of torn ACLs are non-contact injuries. Biomechanical testing with video taping can help an athlete visually see how their knees are positioned upon landing, and they can now be retrained, with intensive rehab, to change high-risk landing styles.
Other factors that improve recovery from ACL tears include greater knowledge on pain control, and also player dedication is huge. There is a reason why Adrian Peterson recovered quickly, and that is intense dedication to his craft. Ryan Broyles is already running, just two months out from his torn ACL. Meanwhile, Kenny Britt’s recovery has been slower, and that’s not a surprise.
I wanted to briefly contrast injured ACLs from torn Achilles tendons. Torn Achilles tendons are much less common in the NFL. One study from Thomas Jefferson Hospital evaluated 406 cases over ten years, while there are 200,000 ACL injuries per year in the United States. Less common injuries mean fewer cases for surgeons and that will slow down progress in the field. A torn Achilles tendon usually occurs when the lower leg is extended, and the foot is dorsiflexed (the heel is flat on the ground, while the toes and arch of the foot are pointed upwards). This position stretches the tendon too much, and it can tear, particularly with sudden force and rapid changes in position. There is an excellent study from Duke, published in 2009, that describes recovery rates for NFL players with a torn Achilles tendon between 1997 to 2002. In total, 31 NFL players were evaluated and 36% were unable to return to play at all after surgery. The remaining players had a substantial reduction in performance, measured by variables such as receiving yards, passing yards, rushing and receiving touchdowns. The average reduction in production, and therefore fantasy football points, was 50%. Running backs and wide receivers had up to an 83 to 88% drop in production in this study. NFL players also missed more games, as these players averaged 12 games per year before surgery, and six games per year after surgery. Worse yet, their post-surgery performance got worse over the following three years. Sorry Kendall Hunter owners (that includes me). Surgery to repair Achilles tendons can be challenging, as the tendon is about six inches long, and the surgeon must repair it in a way that maintains the exact tension necessary for each patient. If the tendon is too loose, calf muscles will stretch it over time, the tendon is elongated, and this reduces power to push off. This complication impacted Dan Marino’s recovery from a torn Achilles. The other issue with Achilles tendon injuries is a more conservative rehabilitation process. Athletes are placed in a cast, and are non-weight bearing for six to eight weeks or longer. Again, this makes recovery of strength in lower leg muscles a more laborious process. There is a trend, however, to advance mobility and exercise for athletes recovering from surgery for a torn Achilles tendon, so in time this might improve the outlook for athletes with reconstructed Achilles tendons.
The moral of the story for dynasty owners? ACL injuries are not as bad as once feared, whereas a torn Achilles tendon is still a very bad thing for a dynasty player and owner. Owners of Broyles can sleep well tonight. But, for owners of Mikel Leshoure and Hunter, it is more like a nightmare.
References
1. Parekh SG, Wray WH 3rd, Brimmo O, Sennett BJ, Wapner KL. Epidemiology and Outcomes of Achilles Tendon Ruptures in the National Football League. Foot & Ankle Specialist, 2009 Dec; 2(6): 283-6.













Demaryius Thomas came back from his achilles. Leshoure might get some of his burst back. We’ll see in 2013
The achilles is more of an 18-24 month injury in terms of recovering explosiveness. The younger the athlete the more likely that the recovery will be successful.
As for this article, I would like to see the issue of PEDs and advancements there brought into the discussion. It is not improved surgical technique alone that is bringing back players so fast and at or even above their previous performance levels. The money involved for players, agents, corporations (promotions), teams, and the league is too great for there to be any real incentive to catch cheating or take serious measures to prevent cheating. The appearance of propriety has more value than propriety itself. In other words, I’ll believe AP came back so fast and better than ever when he pees into a cup at halftime and it is tested right there in front of a live national audience. Until then…
I do, however, have a challenge for the operators of the site: Go an entire week without mentioning Ryan Broyles. Just once.
Wow, talk about a cynical viewpoint..
As for Broyles, the articles are written independently by writers that are spread out over the country and in one case across the world. Based on your opinion about PEDs, I’m guessing that you think there is some kind of directive or conspiracy to bring up Ryan Broyles as much as possible. I hate to disappoint, but that isn’t the case. In most cases, one writer doesn’t know what the others are doing until it is published, just like you.
Agreed, Jacob. I choose to believe that players like Broyles and AP are just very dedicated to return to play, and their strong efforts in doing so, combined with surgical/rehab advances, are the reason for their excellent progress. Contrast that with Kenny Britt, who is still struggling to return to play. Britt doesn’t strike me as the kind of person who rehabs like a maniac.
Never mentioned any conspiracy. Nor did I link Broyles to PEDs. That is why the two (PEDs and Broyles) were separated by a paragraph break.
This site’s obsession with Broyles though is just herd think. He’s had two ACLs now and hasn’t done anything in the NFL. He’s on a team with serious problems in terms of culture. Readers of the site are aware of him. He doesn’t need to be mentioned across so many different articles. As for the independent writers, well, that goes toward the senior editor or editors and ensuring original content.
Ken,
We appreciate the comments, even if they’re critical. I understand what you assume to be “herd think”, but would you rather we limit the number of mentions a player can get on the site? From our perspective, we strive to allow all of our writers to have their own voice and be able to offer their own opinions, even if/when they differ from ours.
Out of all the rankers on the site, I believe I’m the lowest on Broyles, but I have no problem with independent writers offering their take on him. Limiting writers to only writing about what the editor wanted would be more damaging to our credibility and our readers than what you perceive to be obsession, no?
It’s an interesting point to raise, Ken. But, finding scientific evidence to support PEDs improving recovery from ACL or other injuries may be challenging. I suppose it’s possible, though. One thing is for sure, surgical and rehab techniques have improved considerably, and that has helped athletes recover faster. How much PEDs play into it, though, is uncertain. Good point, though. Thanks!
I’m pretty sure HGH would help a guy recover quicker just based on the nature of what it is.
That said, if Bo Jackson or Terrell Davis could’ve used steroids/HGH for a few months and returned to football at full speed, would you not want them to do so assuming they wanted to do so? I respect not wanting guys to use this stuff solely to bulk up, but I haven’t a clue what justification people use in their heads to advocate forcing a guy to stay injured longer in the name of competitive balance.
PEDs like anabolic steroids or HGH can lead to potential complications that are unhealthy and detrimental long-term for players who use them. I’m sure they might improve recovery, but an experienced surgeon combined with aggressive rehab is the better path, IMO.
Thomas did come back well. A lot depends on whether it was a partial or complete tear. For example, Terrell Suggs had a partial Achilles tear, and that is associated with a faster and more complete recovery. That said, I’m sure there will be players who return from an Achilles tear and play well. If the surgery goes well, it is possible. Based on present data, though, there is a high-likelihood that players with such injuries will experience a significant drop in production. That information can be considered by owners when evaluating talent and whether to acquire or trade players. Look at Mikel Leshoure. His longest run in 2012 was 16 yards, and the Lions recently commented on his lack of explosiveness. That’s the problem with Achilles tears.
Fascinating. Nice read, Doc.
Thanks, Paymon!
In regards to the Achilles, the study involved injuries that happened 10-15 years ago. I’m guessing that a study of ACL injuries from 10-15 years ago might paint a grim picture of those as well. My guess is that the procedure for Achilles tears has evolved and probably improved in that time. While it is more serious than current ACLs, I think it is better than the numbers from the study.
Great job Scott!
Great point, Jacob. I’m sure there will be more recent data sets published as time moves on. Part of the problem in evaluating Achilles tears is the limited number that occur per year. That hinders the ability for studies to be completed, and thus scientific evidence will be limited. That a major tertiary care center, Thomas Jefferson University, saw 406 cases in 10 years speaks to the rarity of it. It will take a multi-institutional study to get the best quality data for Achilles tendon tears for sure. Thanks!
Yeah, getting enough of them to have a valid sample size is an issue. Which is why the study has data that is that old. My personal take is that the Achilles injury now is what the ACL was 5-10 years ago. In another 10 years, the Achilles might be at the same level as the ACL now, which is to say that most players come back from it and get to their pre-injury form within 2 years.
Agreed. I think that will be case.
In the case of Ricky Rubio and Derrick Rose, would them playing on a hard court cause recovery to take longer? If so would the use of “astro-turf” cause players to take longer to come back? I know that “play-turf” is quite grass-like, but it still isn’t as soft as the real thing.
I don’t really know how much you can look across different sports and compare results. The style of the games are very different right down to a fundamental nature of non-contact vs contact. Combine that with very different body types and I’m not sure they are comparable.
I don’t think the hard surface will impact recovery. Astro turf might, in fact, increase risk of an ACL injury, if a foot gets stuck on the turf while the player rotates and plants hard on his/her leg. Interesting side note, female athletes are more likely than male athletes to have an ACL injury, as much as 9:1 (reasons are increased joint laxity, smaller ACLs, valgus landing styes, weaker hamstrings relative to quadriceps ratios).
Very good stuff. Can’t wait to chat with you about it on the podcast this Wednesday, doc.
I have to ask. In all seriousness, who gave my post a thumbs down for saying “nice work, looking forward to chatting with you”? And why??
Hey, Tim.
Thanks for the nice words. Also, I gave you a ‘thumbs up’ to negate that crazy negative vote.
I’m looking forward to joining you and Jarrett next week.
I am currently recovering from an ACL surgery and appreciate indepth article. Thank you!
Thanks for the kind words, Thomas. Good luck with your recovery!
DLF, Wow, you guys just keep taking things to the next level. Talk about in depth analysis and a great educational tool. I look forward to all the future articles like this. The long term player analysis could serve fantasy owners very well. Thanks Dr. Peak for your fantastic and interesting article.
Thanks for the kind words, Jeff. I’m glad it was helpful for you. Much appreciated.