44 Responses to “Is it time to sell Arian Foster?”

  1. Jordan says:

    I ‘own’ Foster in a dynasty league so I might be slightly biased.. However, I believe there are a few things to consider beyond this article.

    1) Training and nutritional knowledge – 20 years ago, VERY few RBs made it past the age of 28, and if they did, they weren’t productive. In today’s game, we are seeing many (i.e. the Frank Gores of the world) remain productive into their late 20s and even into their 30s)

    2) Foster isn’t a bruiser. He can lay a hit but most of his ‘tackles’ are him getting grazed or ran out of bounce. He isn’t taking the punishment like the traditional RBs did in the 80′s and 90′s. (envision the plodders and bruisers pounding it into the 2 and 3 holes play after play)

    3) OTHER OWNERS HAVE THE SAME CONCERN AS THE ARTICLE POINTS OUT – I can’t go into a trade in a dynasty league and expect a ton of premier players for a guy who many consider declining. IF you can get proven and talented youth for this guy, then do it but I’m guessing you will get a mediocre, at best, return for Foster. In that event, don’t dump him just for anything. He isn’t 31 year old Willis McGahee, yet. ;)

    • Zach Walters says:

      I think it all depends on the age/talent of the team’s roster.

      If you are a contender, by all means hold Foster and make another run or two at the chip.

      However, I recommend that any midde-of-the-road or rebuilding team trade Foster now before being left holding the bag on a guy who soon will have the mileage and wear of a used rental car.

      Cue to MJD owners nodding in unison.

  2. Chris R. says:

    Great article. Well written and brought up some great points. The bigger concern here are articles like this one, and a few others the past few months have all been of this tone regarding selling Foster. People in dynasty leagues catch on to this tone, understand his age, volume of touches, declining YPC, and what you have is a market that isn’t flooded with great offers. I am looking to shop him myself as well(I traded MJD last off-season in numerous leagues knowing I could cash in on top value while I could also) but his market isn’t being greeted with great offers.

    This is a guy who could very easily be the #1 fantasy back next year, and there are only a hanful of backs you can even trust in fantasy, if an owner isn’t willing to give up a great offer you have to ride him out. I always want at least another RB back I can start who is younger when I am doing deals like this(I don’t have the depth to move him for a WR or another position) + some on top.

    For example, last year I was targetting deals for MJD like receiving Demarco Murray as a starting point, then a bunch on top. If the ‘plus parts’ weren’t up to par I would just keep him, which is what I am faced with this off-season.

    Anybody who owns Spiller, Doug Martin, Richardson, or any young back grouped in those tiers is not taking on Foster for 1 of those guys unless you overpaid them. So what are some realistic options? Realistic starting points?

    I’m honestly interested because I own Foster on 2 teams I wouldn’t mind moving him on. 1 I am more inclined to hold because he is backed by Lynch, Murray, and L Miller but if anyone has some good starting targets that you could look to target and go from there I’d be curious to here. Not many owners are eager to trade for Foster and in most discussions he’s treated like a 30 year older, not a 27 year older.

    The production you would get for 2 more years is starting to out weigh the return you could get.

  3. T3 says:

    I think many of Foster’s problems stem from the Texans lack of a passing game. If teams are expecting the run over half the time, that’s obviously going to drive down production. If teams don’t feel they have to respect Schaub and the Texans lack of WRs, they’re just going to load up on Foster. If Foster continues to carry at the clip he is at, I still give him at least two more years of top production.

    • Cyrus says:

      As the Andre owner, I wouldn’t mind having Foster and hedging my bets.

      I’ve made an attempt at Foster in some of my leagues, but his owners still value him as a top 3 RB.

  4. Boomer says:

    I sold Foster last year for Trent Richardson, Darren McFadden, and Torrey Smith. This year your options are going to be more limited since if you’re trading him you’re probably looking to get younger off the deal and there’s just not that many quality young backs. If I could get a CJ Spiller, Doug Martin, or Jamaal Charles and a player or two that’s fine. Anything less, if you’re a remote contender, you’re better off keeping Foster.

    • SDMan says:

      Why would anyone trade Doug Martin strait up for Foster? Martin is a new car with 95% tire treed left; Foster is a great old car but his tires only have 30% treed left. In a race Foster may edge Martin out but it won’t be by much.

  5. xlote says:

    Is it time to sell Arian Foster? Not if too many articles like this are widely read. FF is about perceived value, this stuff drives it down.

    • Jordan says:

      Exactly! because of speculation, Foster’s market value is low. He will out perform where is market value is now so if you have him, you are most likely keeping him.

      And BTW – Foster has been the underdog all of his life. I am hoping people doubt him so he can prove you all the doubters wrong. The guy still has the potential to be the #1 RB and is almost a sure lock to be top 5. don’t dump him for the trash people are offering you just because he is 26 going on 27.

    • Chris R. says:

      This was my point. This isn’t the first article like this posted this off-season either, so I don’t know why anyone would think it’s a great time to sell him when that is all you have been reading. He’s got way more value to keep him at this point.

      • Zachary Ragan says:

        A lot of it depends on who you play in leagues with as well. Not everyone is entrenched in the fantasy/dynasty community, so articles and commentaries don’t influence their decision making.

  6. Ray Voeller says:

    Owner in my league 2011 Champ , 2012 Runner up has announced he wants to move Foster. Unfortunately his asking price is off. He is looking for a young top WR AJ, Julio, Bryant, DMerry, Harvin along with a rb like Martin, Spiller, Murray, Wilson. His asking price is waaay outta whack IMO. Feel he was just fishing hoping for a sucker to over pay on Foster. I offered Jordy or Blackmon and 1.1 pick. His counter offer Julio and 1.1 or Trent and Blackmon. My original offer may have been little lite but his counters were way to rich for my fantasy blood. Feel in the end he will hold and attempt to make another run. His core team is still strong Brees, Foster, Lynch, Roddy, Jennings, Graham

    • Cyrus says:

      Yeah, I wouldn’t trade Richardson for Foster. The gap in production is offset by the youth.

      Julio and 1.01 doesn’t make any sense to me either. Plus, Julio will have a much longer career than Foster, I would say I would rather trade Richardson than Julio based on the career argument.

      I think Blackmon and 1.01 is a legit offer. Maybe throw in a veteran RB or someone to offset the loss of Foster, but he would add youth.

  7. Matt Caufield says:

    In similar fashion Zach, I was fortunate to grab Foster off waivers before his breakout season. He’s been nothing short of tremendous on my squad and helped me to B2B Championships. Even with that said, I’m looking to move him now while his value is still a stud RB1. The tough part in my mind is finding the value I want in return. I’m not looking for trade advice in this arena, but wanted to include the current offer we’re discussing as a barometer; Foster for J Stewart/Randall Cobb/2013 rookie pic (3.4)

    To me it comes down to do this, as Foster owners do we trade Foster now for fair value, or ride him into the sunset and perhaps to more championships?

    Tough call, but this is what it’s all about.

    • Cyrus says:

      I wouldn’t trade Foster for that unless you really love Cobb. I’ll add that I like Stewart and think he could do something. But I wouldn’t give up guaranteed production for that risk and a solid WR.

      My brother traded Foster last offseason to capitalize on his “max value.” Unfortunately, he didn’t get a lot, but Dez was part of the deal. That does make up for the other pieces not being that good.

  8. Robert says:

    Are you guys NUTS? Foster has, like, 600 carries in his career.
    What’s AP got–1700? Nobody’s talking about how (relatively) worthless AP is in a trade.
    I have AP in one league, and I’m gonna go check out the Foster owner’s roster RIGHT NOW!

    • Jacob Feldman says:

      Foster has 1010 in the Pros and another 650 in college.

      That’s relatively light when compared to guys like AP at 1754 in the pros and 747 in college. Though comparing anyone to Peterson is dangerous.

      Guys like Ray Rice (1216 pros and 910 in college) are better points of comparison.

      Though I do agree with your point. I think the workload part of the arguement for Foster is/has been blown a bit out of proportion.

      • Eric Olinger says:

        Nice data driven response. Hard to argue numbers like that and I totally agree. The key to a great dynasty trade is TIMING. Neither Jacob or Zach are saying to flood the other owners with knee jerk trade offers. Zach has spotted a downward trend and shared it. Anyone that was bitten by Shawn Alexander or LaDanian Tomlinson knows how this feels.

        • Robert says:

          Excellent info. Only being half-serious, I just glanced at the first list of yearly totals I came across. Plus it’s easy for me to say, sitting on AP after an amazing season. Suffice it to say, methinks these rumors about Arian Foster’s death are “greatly exaggerated” lol.

    • sean mcguigan says:

      600 carries? What math are you using he has over 1000 plus another 200 catches plus another 800 total touches in college….for me his YPG say it all it wasn’t just one year it is now officially a trend and a downward one at that….I would be surprised if coming off a almost 400 touch year last year that this trend reverses….he is not AP and none should be compared to that freak of nature…Jacob is correct if you can get the right price could be a good time to move him….Doubt Tate will have another injury plagued year and could emerge as better back when all is said and done next year(he has better measureables that is for sure and when the kid was healthy I would argue he looked like the better back)….. the decline is real ignore it if you like.

      • Robert says:

        No argument here. I was fudging on the low side for “effect”, plus I obviously missed a season in there somewhere. Though I WOULD love to pick Foster up, I agree the author is spot on that now is the time to be prepared to deal him.

        Another thing I had forgotten about is that “mysterious” heart condition. What’s the scoop on that, and do you feel that play into the equation?

  9. John says:

    If it isn’t time to sell, it definitely is time to consider it. Better to sell one year early than one year too late. There has been a noticeable decline in Foster’s numbers (excluding TDs). His workload over this stretch of dominance reminds me of Shaun Alexander and Priest Holmes. No matter how good Foster’s training regimen is or how much he avoids taking big hits (unless he is running out of bounds, he is getting hit by other players and hitting the ground each time he touches the ball), handling the ball so much take a toll. Often times, owners get too caught up in not getting absolute MAX value at the present time. The key is to get proper value 2-3 years down the line.

  10. Matt Mueller says:

    I’m holding Rodgers/Kap and the Foster owner, loaded at rb, has been tossing around the idea of Kap-Forte for Foster-Flacco…

    On face value I think Forte can rebound for a few years and I’m not sure the shorterm upgrade at rb is worth the longterm asset lose of Kap. Additionally this is a 3 year contract league and I only have Rodgers for 2 more years so I need to consider what I can move these guys for…

    What do you guys think of this deal? Fair value?

    We’ve hit a stale mate in trade talks as the owner also wants a 2 second round picks or Pitta tossed in from my Kap-Forte side…way too much imo.

    • Matt Caldwell says:

      can you tag players after the 3 years is up or are they gone? Can you bid on the players coming off contract?

      • Mullmania says:

        Got to trade or release players within 3 years. So my thinking is do I want to be ‘selling’ Rodgers or Kap next year for a big return or look to move Rodgers/Foster 2-3 years from now?

        I’ve got to think in 2-3 years that Rodgers-Kap will have more ‘sell’ value and that might not be worth a short term RB1 upgrade…

  11. Dave Lamson says:

    I’m fortunate in that I own Foster and Tate both. I’m of the mind Im going to ride him to the end. His value is still so high that I just feel it will be difficult to receive equal value. I’ve been guilty of giving up on others a year or two too soon (Tomlinson & Turner). So I’ve just decided that I would rather ride this pony till the end and then see what happens.

  12. Jon says:

    Foster is almost a lock for top 5 numbers for the next two years. I agree that the decline is reason for concern but the overreactions to this are to wide spread. He has much more value right now to his current owners than they could ever expect back in a trade. My advice to Foster owners – Keep him and plug him in each week and smile at the advantage he gives you. If you are going to move him, you can’t expect Martin or TRich for him straight up plus something. That is ridiculous. Also, can’t expect wr’s like AJG or Julio… Foster is a stud that has a couple years left. But those couple years could be top 5 years…

  13. Chad Scott says:

    I think Zach ended the article perfectly…

    If you don’t think your team is in contention for a title, your best bet is to move Foster at some point before it’s too late.

    If you are a contender and not getting serious trade offers, you ride him into the sunset, hopefully with a few ‘ships to his (your) name.

  14. Mullmania says:

    In a startup would you rather Foster-Flacco or Kap-Forte?

    • Avery Beck says:

      If Flacco or Kaepernick were going to be my QB1, I would take the Kaep/Forte side. Only because I don’t think Flacco has the upside to ever be in the top 5 scoring qbs in the league like Kaep does and I think Forte, who has racked up at least 1400 yards and caught 40+ every single year of his career, is still a RB1.

  15. Nap says:

    Question; kinda off topic but I was just offered D. Thomas and the 2.05 for Ray Rice??
    My best WR is Nicks and my best RB s T. Rich

    • sean mcguigan says:

      Tough one I think d Thomas is ready to explode and he was top 5 already last year….I wouldn’t do it butninam probably in the minority I love rice but he was kind of inconsistent last year and lot of tread there….Thomas could/should be a top WR for the next decade tough to trade that….6 3 230 lbs and runs a 4.35 those together don’t come around all that often

    • Carmo says:

      Sorry Im kinda confused on what 2.05 means is that 5th overall in 2nd round or 2nd pick in 5th round?

      if its round 2 pick 5 and dt for ray i would do it, first off B Pierce will cut into Ray Rice production somewhat and why not get the best years w P Manning out of DT, you have Trent to ride the franchise, Ray is 26, DT 24 with more upside..

  16. alden bietz says:

    So would it be a fair trade with Foster, for Luck.

  17. Coach says:

    lol. i hope you guys keep on posting stuff like this. scare off the foster owners and have them sell him to me cheap.

    if i had the first pick of any draft of any type id call out arian foster. and you’re nutsy if you don’t.

  18. Alex says:

    I traded foster pre season last year along with javon ringer to a cj2k owner for jordy, Doug Martin and a first. Everyone hated at the time but this is turning out to be an amazing trade. I had forte and gore as well which allowed some flexibility. The time is now.

  19. Brian says:

    Semi-related, what tends to be a better barometer for RB decline. Age in general or number of carries for career? I.e. spiller is older than d Martin but has been worked into his role compared to significant carries for Martin from the get go. Spiller will close in on 30 much sooner but have similar carries possibly as Martin who would only be 25-26ish?

    • John says:

      Number of touches is a better barometer. I mentioned Priest Holmes earlier. He was 28 when he got to KC. He had only about 1 1/2 seasons of NFL wear and tear on his body. He dominated from age 28-31. The workload he got over 3 1/2 years wore him down more than chronological age.

  20. Michael says:

    There is so much information out there about Fosters declining YPC 4.9, 4.4, 4.1. What no one seems to mention is the fact that the offensive line took two huge losses last year in Winston and Brisiel. The right side of the line went from a strength to a liability. Ben Jones, Derek Newton, and Ryan Harris are just not as good and no one should have expected them to be. Jones is a rookie and Newton was 2nd year perhaps that group will get better in time. Additionally, I am holding out hope that they take advantage of a stacked class of tackles in FA and a stacked class of guards in the draft? Arian’s YPC was also hurt by the fact that the Texans often gave him the ball in impossible situations, like handing to him three times against a fired up Bears D to close out the game, which resulted in -4 yards. He seemed to be in more manageable situations in his first two years as the Texans D wasn’t quite as dominant. Bottom Line – I adore the man. I own both him and Ben Tate in what I consider the most competitive dynasty league in the world and I have decided to ride him for at least two more years. Whatever the outcome I know I will enjoy the ride.

    • ccj says:

      I was coming to post this. Also his playoff performances were fantastic. I’m a buyer, I think he has more than two years left.

Leave a Comment