16 Responses to “Pryority?”

  1. Doug Veatch says:

    If Oakland does finish dead last (like many experts are predicting)Pryor will get a real opportunity to show what he can do. Right now his sample size is only 1 NFL start, but it was a decent showing. I think at this moment Pryor should be left on the wire in 1 QB leagues, but for those of us that play in 2 QB leagues, you really couldn’t ask for a better stash due to his athleticism.

  2. Brad from Columbus says:

    I went to Ohio State when Pryor was there and saw him play live around 20 times. I have him rostered in my fantasy league (it is a really deep league), but I see him more as a spot play in emergencies even if he lands the starting job. At Ohio State his decision making was consistently bad (besides one amazing game he played against Oregon) and many people in Columbus believe he is a very bad locker room guy/leader. A friend of mine was his resident adviser (RA) in his freshman dorm, and had nothing but terrible things to say about him as a person.

    The article says his accuracy is a problem, but that is an understatement. He does not have the accuracy to be an NFL quarterback unless the Raiders have been able to fix something the Ohio State coaches have not. I have him rostered in the hope that he crashes as a QB next year and finally decides to switch to TE or WR. He could be a great WR.

  3. Adam Franssen says:

    I think you’re right – a deep dynasty league stash might be worth it.

    As a side note, when was the last time an Ohio State player did anything useful for dynasty leaguers? Beanie Wells? Santonio Holmes? Ted Ginn and his whole family?

  4. Chris R. says:

    I have him rostered in a 2 QB league, outside of that, no thanks. I don’t even know why he’s worth much discussion. I guess you shouldn’t discount anybody, but he has never looked like a decent QB, ever. Not for a game, or in flashes, he has never developed, his accuracy and footwork has always been terrible, I just don’t see it.

    He’s got elite size, he’s fast, and has a huge arm. That’s literally where it stops. For me I need to see more then that to get excited about a QB prospect. I have him in my 2QB league solely as trade bait. I saw a bunch of him at College and it was literally like playing a WR at QB. The only reason the deep routes were so effective was due to his huge arm and the fact that he started a bunch of those plays out running forward, drawing up the Safeties, then dropping back and throwing it past everyone.

    I don’t doubt that he wont get a shot. With all the athletic QB’s, and how bad Oakland wants the QBotf he may as well get a shot, but he was a terrible QB prospect coming out that everyone saw except for Al Davis because he only scouted 40 times.

    For a comparison, he makes Jake Locker look like a seasoned veteran, and with how much he has struggled there is no hope for Pryor as far as I’m concerned.

  5. BPP says:

    If he is going to actually be in a competition for the starting gig there, he absolutely should be rostered in 12-team 20+ roster leagues due to his running ability. Even Tebow was worth rostering when he was starting.

    • sixshooter says:

      Only if you are desperate for a QB because our league is a 25 man roster with an additional 2 IR spots meaning you can have 27 total players and nobody has Terrell Pryor but there are also no starting QB’s available either.

      I would guess somebody will add him once the waivers open up in the next couple weeks but he won’t be on my roster although I did draft Tebow with my first pick (2.3, 15th overall) after acquiring my Dynasty team and he was more than worth rostering last year……he was a borderline must start with the fantasy pts he was racking up which was almost 22 pts/week in that league if you exclude the first four games of the season which he did not play and the last game of the season which was a fantasy offseason week which he was limited in anyway!!!

  6. Matthew Bowser says:

    I hold hime in my 2 QB leagues and have for some time. Do I think he is worth a damn? NO. But, in the event someone else in my league does (and there is always one guy) I will continue to stash him in hopes of nabbing a RB or WR of value. Hopefully an aging vet someone is looking to unload for pennies on the dollar.

  7. Toby Eckelbob says:

    This debate raises the question why the Raiders only gave him one start last year when they were eliminated from playoff contention in October or early November. Their mistake leaves that franchise and dynasty owners more “in the dark” than necessary about his ability at the NFL level.

    • Billy Glen says:

      I’m targeting him in a 2qb league, but only because I have palmer (won the league last year with rodgers, palmer and locker).

  8. Nevercrywolf says:

    I think the most significant thin Pryor did in the San Diego start occurred during the fight that broke out on the field. Pryor got right in the middle, and tossed his own player across the field to break it up. To me, that’s a “take charge” leadership decision (you can’t toss an opposing player) especially when you consider Pryor was simply a backup who was only playing one game. To stand in the middle of a melee and say “No. This is not how MY team acts on field” was pretty impressive to me.
    For that reason alone, I have Pryor on the end of my bench, just to see what happens during the off season.

  9. Bloody Sabbath says:

    Lack of character lack of integrity lack of accountability. A sub 4.4 and to be able to throw 70+ means squat just ask Jamarcus Russel then get in your time machine and dial up Jeff George. Pryor wont be in the NFL much longer he will be exposed

  10. Jay Malpass says:

    Holding him in a deep league as my QB3 where I have an older elite QB1 and an average young QB2 with a low ceiling. Figured he either steps up next year and becomes my 2 or he washes out and gets thrown in my WR/TE mix.

Leave a Comment