6 Responses to “Secondary WRs”

  1. Rob says:

    Definite truth to this article. I remember drafting an up-and-coming guy who was the WR2 on his team back in 2004. Drafted him over the likes of many others that were considered their team’s number one. Worked out pretty well. Guy was Reggie Wayne when Marvin Harrison was STILL the lead guy. Same could be said for Bruce and Holt of the Rams back in the day. In those high-powered offenses, there is usually plenty to go around.

    Difference now is that it is becoming more and more common for the reasons that you mentioned…

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. bigd says:

    i’m a firm believer that the reason the passing game is flourishing and thus more passes to the 2nd and 3rd option, and the explosion of the TE position is the lack of using a horse running back exclusively in the offense anymore. teams do not use just one back and pound the ground game like they used to because simply one rb can’t hold up to a grueling 16 game season and make it through alive. thus the RB by committe approach. this is turn also effects the qb whos spreads the ball around. if a team now passes more, you need to have more targets so the Ds can’t focus in and shut down your offense. thus look at all the successful QBs and you’ll see them all spread it around.

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. MT says:

    Who said Victor Cruz is the #2 on his team?

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
  4. Bob Mozitis says:

    Thanks for the comments, guys.

    In retrospect, I wish I had framed the thesis of the article slightly differently. I didn’t mean for it to read as an argument for who is a #1 WR and who is a #2 WR as much as I wanted it to show that BOTH can be elite in fantasy. In the past, as Rob mentioned in the comments, there were only a few teams that could support 2 big fantasy WR’s (Rams, Colts, Vikings). On other teams, you always had the fear that the number 2 guy was a fluke, and you were probably usually right (Peerless Price and guys like that). The point I was more trying to get across was that due to the increase in passing yardage league-wide, I think there are now upwards of 10-12 teams where you can count on the #2 or even #3 option at WR. And I do not think this is a fluke due to the reasons I mentioned (kickoff rule being the most important). So if your opponents are still clinging to the fact that most teams can’t support 2 big time fantasy WR’s over time, you can take advantage and acquire a guy like Cruz or Nelson who others might write off as a “fluke”. But as I said, beware of rule changes which could change the landscape of the NFL as a whole.

    I hope that clears up my main point a little bit. The question of whether a guy like Cruz is the #1 or #2 is clearly up for debate, and a legit argument.

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. Eric says:

    Good article that makes a lot of sense

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  6. tim says:

    I think the key point you make is that there are going to be offenses that can consistently support two legit fantasy WRs. Cruz’s emergence destroyed Manningham’s value, but honestly did little to Nicks. Sure, Nick’s owners hoped for more this year but he still finished as a top-12 WR. Wallace was still a stud even with Brown who basically crushed the hopes of Sanders owners. Colston was still a stud and even though Graham emerged as a TD machine but then the rest of the entire NO offense was sketchy for fantasy.

    It’s becoming less important to worry about who is the WR1 or WR2 on their teams and focus instead on the offense as a whole and the individual performers.

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Comment