8 Responses to “Keepin’ it Real”

  1. repkllrs says:

    How can this list not be headlined by Cam Newton? I think Stafford is far more likely to throw for 40+ touchdowns again, than Cam to run for 14.

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: +4 (from 4 votes)
    • Ken Kelly says:

      Call me crazy, but I’m not so sure. He may not run for 14 scores again, but he posted those numbers (plus another 21 passing scores) WITH 20 turnovers lsat year. If he can cut down on the INTs, he could match that point total from last year.

      I went back and forth on him, but I think it’s really tough to bet against him even with him posting the best rookie season possibly ever.

      I would 100% agree that there’s little chance of improvement, but I see Newton’s chances to match his total from last year as being greater than these on this list. Not GREAT, but greater than these listed.

      VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
      Rating: +4 (from 4 votes)
    • Rag3aholik says:

      Agreed on cam. Very good chance for regression. Stafford I think should be on here as well, but not to the same extent. Rodgers; I understand why he’s on here, and he may well regress, but after leading all players for several years do you really think it’s noteworthy to mention? He’s the single safest bet in fantasy football. Regression would be back to his career mean, which is nothing short of ridiculous.

      VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
      Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
  2. DLF_KenK says:

    Yep, still a safe bet for sure. I’ve just seen articles lately predicting 50 touchdowns, which I think is ridiculous. Possible? Yes. Predictable? No.

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. Coach says:

    the only guy i have on this list is MJD. I think he can eclipse what he did this year. i don’t think 1,600 and double digit scores is out of reach.

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ken Kelly says:

      Out of reach? No. A safe bet to pencil in? I don’t think so, either. As I said in the post, I think MJD likely has the best chance of any of these players to repeat those numbers, especially with the low-end TD number. However, 642 carries in the past two years worries me a little.

      The Jags have thrown all their eggs in the MJD basket and you have to hope he’s up for the task yet again. I’d just be a little modest when taking a guess at next year’s numbers.

      VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
      Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
    • Camperhead says:

      It’s correct that the Jags had no other offensive weapons, but MJD wouldn’t have had anywhere near the workload if they hadn’t prematurely IR’d Rashad Jennings, who was set up for an increased role. Add that, further development by Gabbert (it HAS to get better , doesn’t it?) and the presumed offseason focus on adding more to the receiving corps, and MJD — while still a stud — is due for a regression.

      VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
      Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
  4. tstafford says:

    Totally agree on both Washington and Cruz. By the way, I think we saw exactly what will happen when teams key on Cruz in the SB. Nicks torched the Pats and Manningham did his best David Tyree impression. They got to be up on the podium with the trophy. I sort of felt bad for Cruz.

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Comment