23 Responses to “A Different Breed”

  1. Jordan says:

    This article came at a good time when I’m looking at roster stashes for next season and who to cut to make room for them. I’m staring at Jared Cook on a couple of my teams and wondering if he’s still worth holding on to or if he’s droppable to pick up another stash on the wire.

  2. Tim says:

    This is really good stuff and I think spot on. I’ve been feeling this way for a while now but hadn’t completely put my finger on it. Thanks for the clarity.

  3. Peter says:

    I recall reading something a year or three ago that the reason TEs take longer to develop than many positions is they have to master both blocking and receiving to get consistent high snaps and thus be fantasy-relevant/desirable.

  4. Zach Levitt says:

    V Davis is killing me right now…I also have Celek (Out) and Dwayne Allen. Kendricks, Housler, Pitta, and Jordan Cameron are all on the WW. Any of those guys worth picking up over my 3 TEs? Which guy would you drop?

    • Cyrus says:

      I think I would pick up Pitta over Celek, but it would be close. I just like Pitta’s upside over Celek, without looking at the stats for this year. Both are inconsistent.

      Wouldn’t drop Davis because he has the most talent, despite the lack of production. Wouldn’t drop Allen because he is a rookie and who knows what he will do.

      I would consider trading Davis if anyone still values him.

    • JBlake says:

      If this is a dynasty league, those are some shocking TE names to see on waivers. Pitta is the best of that group for the rest of the season, but probably no better that Allen. Make sure Tony Scheffler is not available…

      • Doug Veatch says:

        JBlake is right on here. The only reason I can think of that these guys wouldn’t be rostered is because of shallow rosters. Other than that, I’d be willing to pick up any of these guys with Kendricks being the cream of the crop in my opinion.

      • SJ says:

        Indeed. all of those are way gone in most leagues imo.

        That said, Id take Pitta, Housler over Allen, eventho i really like him. Pitta distanced himself from a timeshare, and Housler looks like he has taken a fulltime spot as well. Makes a big difference in consistency.

        • Zach Levitt says:

          It’s a 12-team 35 player roster (IDP) league. About half the teams have 2 TEs and the other half has 3 (max limit). For some reason, no one pays attention to the TE position.

          I’m gonna pick up Pitta but I like Kendricks potential…so I’m little torn

  5. Cyrus says:

    Olsen changed hands midseason this year in my favorite league. Part of a deal to get JPP, so it isn’t clear what his standalone value is.

    Bennett was traded midseason for a 3rd and a 4th. I thought that was low value, but then he stopped producing for a bit.

    Gresham was traded for a 3rd in 2014, which I thought was insanely low value. I would have offered a 3rd this year had I been given the chance, maybe even a late 2nd.

    Rudolph and Kendricks went in the 2nd and the owners haven’t considered trading them.

    Of all of them, I would probably go after Gresham the hardest, Rudolph second hardest and Kendricks if he was the cheapest. I think Gresham will continue to catch more and that Rudolph will be more consistent.

    I anticipated TE being an advantage and traded the 1.01 in a deal to get Graham before the season. He hasn’t been as dominant as I expected, but he has been consistent, and that is worth a lot. Sad I missed out on Richardson, but I got a haul in return, so I think I made a good trade. Graham and Gronk are ways to give your team an edge.

  6. Mike D says:

    No mention of Housler? I’d take a shot on him before Kendricks. I love Housler’s skills (size, speed) and just needs a QB to get him the ball.

    • SJ says:

      I’ve given up on Kendricks long ago. Housler is producing higher than Kendricks ever has

      • Doug Veatch says:

        Kendricks hasn’t even played two full seasons yet. It’s too soon to give up on a player with his skill set.

        • SJ says:

          What has Kendricks done to warrent upside? Please convince me.

          There’s no in depth over him in your article and he’s far less established than the tes you have listed

          • Doug Veatch says:

            Well, if you take a closer look at the numbers he has four more catches this season than last on nine less targets. While not a huge improvement at first glance, what it means to me is that he’s running better routes. Last season he posted a stat line of 28/352/0 on 59 targets. This season he’s currently sitting at 32/322/2 on only 50 targets with 3 games yet to play. This is exactly what I like to see out of a young TE. Improvement. Couple that with the fact that Bradford has had a nice comeback year and seems to be moving along in his development and Jeff Fisher as the HC, I see the entire STL offense trending upward.

          • SJ says:

            I understand what your saying, it just doesnt sound very convincing. With that analysis, it sounds like your saying hes on pace to grow to only a 36/380/3 stat line at this point next year. That pace doesnt sound like hes a player on the cusp and ready for a breakout.

            Without being defensive, its hard to ask people to give up picks for someone like that, especially when it comes to Kendricks, in particular.

            Coming out of college he was thought of as a athletic pass catching TE who needed to work on his blocking. He was a high pick (round 2) that had little competition for a starting job in STL.

            He elevated to starter almost immediately his rookie year. But was marred with drops and inconsistency his the whole season. Hes relatively durable and missed few games, but never “wowed” reporters covering the team in this offseason or over the course of the season. He still having trouble with drops and hasnt done anything to impose Bradford to target him significatly. That bothers me as Bradford has had a better season than last year almost in spite of using Kendricks more. Kendricks role and usage seems to have plateaued. I argue that his numbers show that and I think thats a fair assumption. Of bigger concern is the lack of exemplary reports on his over the last years time.

            When talking about the aforementioned Te’s in the article, they’ve all had positive buzz about them on the practice field and in season before experiencing a breakout. I worry that Kendricks lack of explosiveness, drive or offensive significance is causing this. I think thats a fair belief.

    • Doug Veatch says:

      I’d like to go on the record of being a Housler fan. He seems to be drawing a good majority of the targets even under the worst possible conditions. He’s still a bit of a developmental player IMO, but if you can acquire him for the right price I’m all for it. I’d say an early third round pick should do the trick, but his max value should be no better than a late second right now. He’s a player that needs to be acquired before a new QB comes to town.

  7. Chris R. says:

    Great post. I cannot count how many times I have declined deals for Graham or Gronkowski. Even as of recent I had an offer of Brandon Marshall and Vernon Davis for Graham + a 2nd and while it was tough I passed. Marshall is a stud sure, but it’s just so much easier finding big time WR production then it is elite TE production.

    How often do you think you’ll come across a TE who is under 25 and can post a 90/1300/12 stat line? That’s extremely valuable for a position that plays well into their mid 30′s at least without dropping off too much. In leagues I own those guys, they are un touchable. Not that I wouldn’t be able to improve elsewhere, but that’s a weekly advantage I have I am not willing to lose.

  8. Ryan ebert says:

    Not one mention of Hernandez?

    • JBlake says:

      How should he have fit in this article? Hernandez is the consensus #3 TE. He’s not as good as Gronk/Graham, and he’s not a breakout candidate you can get for a 2nd round pick.

      Hernandez almost deserves a separate article because he’s completely different, basically a slot reveiver who’s categorized as a TE. Hernandez is rarely asked to block in the traditional “6th lineman” way, so he was able to break out muck quicker. I can’t think of any others in that category except for maybe Fleener, Niles Paul converting from WR, and Scheffler who the Lions use in the slot.

  9. Rob Spaulding says:

    Just picked up Kendricks off waivers. Already have Daniels and Olsen.
    Won my division (9-4) with strong QB, WR and TE play and virtually nothing from my RBs.

  10. Rob Spaulding says:

    Forgot to add that this is a dynasty league.

    • Brad Roberts says:

      Glad I stumbled on upon this article. I drafted Kendricks with pick 13 in my dynasty draft, based on the extremely good pre-season he had his rookie year. I thought he would be the next big thing, still waiting. I nearly dropped him several times, but luckily did not based on the price I payed for him.
      This article gives me a glimmer of hope going into the upcoming years. In hind sight I would never take a TE before round 3 in a rookie only draft, especially now that I’ve seen a plethora of TE’s come and go on the waiver wire since drafting kendricks. The latest being Pitta and Myers

Leave a Comment