17 Responses to “DLF Mock Draft Study: Rounds One and Two”

  1. Phorts says:

    Thanks for the write up Jarrett. I enjoyed following the draft and use it often to gauge value and potential trade targets.

    One question I have for you is, can you elaborate why you chose Nicks over AJ Green with your pick 1.09? Thanks!

    • Jarrett Behar says:

      Sure – essentially Nicks is about the same age (less than 6 months older) than Green, has 2 full seasons under his belt, is currently playing in a more wide open offense, has a veteran QB in his prime that trusts him, and has a better WR2 to draw coverage away. Those factors make Nicks the dynasty WR2 and Green WR3 for me.

      • Greg G. says:

        I really wasn’t sold on AJ Green before last season. I think we need to see another solid season out of him before we can consider him an elite prospect. Despite injury, Nicks has shown consistency. His playoff run was a thing of beauty. Is it a sign of things to come? As for Green, I pray he isn’t Mike Williams part two. I don’t think he is but only time will tell. Rankings are fluid. Next year Green could be one of the top receivers in football OR a member of the sophmore slumpers…In my opinion, he will be a solid player.

        • Greg G. says:

          I think the best players have a combination of ability and experience. They both have tremendous ability and youth. What separates them is experience and game knowledge.

  2. Bob says:

    Really like the piece here. I would be curious to see your tiers for all positions so as to have when contemplating moves etc.

    • Jarrett Behar says:

      Thanks – maybe I’ll do a tier article after the NFL Draft – I find tiers to be more helpful than straight rankings because often times we are just splitting hairs with respect to a few players.

  3. Sensai_John_Kreese says:

    Sproles at 5.2??????????????

    Madness.

    • Greg G. says:

      In PPR format and return yardage leagues, he was ranked top 5. He was like a receiver and running back rolled into one. His name may not be as sexy as Rice or Foster but when it came to delivering, he did. The numbers don’t lie!

      • Sensai_John_Kreese says:

        Im saying Sproles should have gone much, much higher

        I have no problem taking him in the late third or early fourth. In my league, i have Sproles, Chris Johnson and Ryan Mathews.

        Sproles is the only one of the 3 i consider a must start every week.

        • I think him being 28 is one of the reasons why he stays on the board so long. Sure he’s a different animal being that he isn’t hit on many of his carries, but he’s certainly getting up there.

          • Greg G. says:

            Sorry Sensai! Granted, he is approaching 30, but his size, low mileage, and offensive role lead me to believe he will be very productive for at least another 4 years. He is truly what Bush was during his best season (what the Saints had hoped Bush would be). I believe he will see no fewer than 70 receptions per season. That in itself is attention getting in PPR circles. How many backs have found more success during the latter part of their careers? I’d be curious to know!!!

      • tstafford says:

        I had him queued up for my pick at the 5.06 but missed out. I didn’t take him over Bradshaw at the 4.10, but I can see the argument. He still went off as the RB#17. I guess I could see taking him over Bradshaw and Ingram, but really who else above him would you say?

        • Sensai_John_Kreese says:

          Id take him over Dwayne Bowe, Colston, Maclin, Jordy Nelson, CJ Spiller, Miles Austin, VJAX, Steve Johnson and maybe even Roddy. Dude was the RB2 in my league last year.

          I dont know if your league accounts for return yardage, mine does, so that may skew the numbers a bit.

          • tstafford says:

            Well yeah! That would move the needle a ton. This mock was predicated on WCOFF scoring.

          • bigd says:

            not many of our leagues carry return yardage. not sure if i’d want that. like was said it really skews thing out of balance. not sure i would take him over solid starting prospects like, jordy, bowe, colston, austin, and vjax? sure not over roddy! i’d factor in the committee situation always. sproles is a producer no doubt, but these guys are solid starters that could easily out produce him in their given situations in 2012?

  4. Rich Acu. says:

    Is there a website where I can follow your dynasty draft on-line??? I would love to check in on it every so often.

    • Jarrett Behar says:

      Click the links in the second paragraph. The draft finished a few weeks ago. Another review article is coming shortly.

Leave a Comment