11 Responses to “Week One Aftermath”

  1. Adam says:

    Cam played an incredible game but as far as I’m concerned if you’re handing out a fantasy MVP for any week the player should have at least started in at least half of the fantasy leagues. Did anyone start Cam this week? Most valuable bench player? Sure, why not. Last I checked bench points don’t count though.

    How many fantasy owners won this week as a result of starting Brady that otherwise would have lost? I’m guessing a sizable number.

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: +4 (from 4 votes)
    • DLF_KenK says:

      Brady would certainly be an easy pick. He and Ray Rice were two other solid candidates. I went with the shocking nature of Newton’s performance because I can imagine a team in a two QB league benefited enormously.

      I also wanted to find a way to take the opportunity to let people know they shouldn’t expect that every week. It was an easy avenue to do that.

      Good luck next week!

      VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
      Rating: -3 (from 5 votes)
  2. Ken says:

    Eric Decker is on waivers in my league as is Baldwin, Arrington, and Jacoby Jones. I have Antonio Brown and Harry Douglas on my roster, would you drop either or both and if so who would you choose.

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. DrR says:

    Hey Guys,
    Here’s my line-up (As I would rank them):
    QB:Freeman,Manning
    RB:McCoy,CJohnson,BGE
    WR:Wallace,Meachem,Mike Thomas,Moore,Crabtree,Ward
    TE:Witten,Clark
    K:Janikowski
    DEF: Pitt

    I really like Freeman’s ability but I’m not ready to give him full reign of my fantasy team yet. As far as I’m concerned Manning’s season is over (they won’t rush him back if he gets healthy i.e Romo ’10). I think I’m going to drop him and pick up another QB to help out. Looking at Fitzpatrick, Newton, Sanchez, Orton, Cassel.
    I’m impressed with Newton but I don’t see him keeping that up as a rookie, I expect a fall. I’m mostly leaning Fitz, he blew up last year then quieted down but I think he’s got a better season in him and is the best bet. Thoughts?

    Also looking at C.Williams or Tate (mostly to help during early bye weeks) I think C.Williams will be more relevant for more time.

    Moore, Crabtree and Ward are on the chopping block to make room. Who and How many people do you think could go to open up space

    Thanks. Always appreciate your insights

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • DrR says:

      Sorry its also a re-draft league (only looking for production this season), 0.5PPR.

      Everything else is pretty standard

      Thanks

      VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
      • DLF_KenK says:

        I’d go with Fitzpatrick there in a redraft league. His production is worth biting the bullet on Manning. I’d also pick up C Williams AND Tate for Ward and Moore. If that’s the extent of yoru roster size, there should be plenty of WRs on the wire.

        VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. Desmond says:

    what did u guys think about Spiller? I have stashed him in my dynasty,he looked plenty fast on the TD run but Jackson was the bell cow. Is he worth stashing for another year for the 3rd year breakout ala MacFadden?

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • DLF_KenK says:

      Spiller shows some flashes, but also bounces too many runs to the outside. That being said, I don’t know a dynasty league where I’d recommend cutting bait on him. He’s still very young and has a chance to evolve this season.

      VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
      Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  5. Vintage says:

    I thought I was in big trouble when I missed one of my drafts this year. It’s a redraft league, and last year I picked up M.Vick. This year I’ve got Fitzpatrick and Newton and feel just as confident in my QB position. Fitzpatrick in my opinion is a low end QB1 if not better, and if Newton surprises everyone again in week 2 against the Packers, we may have wished we’d bought as low as possible on the guy before the season’s half over.

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)

Leave a Comment