12 Responses to “The Talented Mr. Ridley”

  1. A Bietz says:

    Keep us informed on whats happening in Ridleys and Vereens fantasy value. All the pre seasom hype has been Vereen but how do they compare now?

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • DLF_KenK says:

      No change after last night. Things need to be kept in perspective. The first preseason game means very little. Players can move down the ladder more than up this early.

      That being said, Vereen is still the rookie back to own for the Pats, but it’s clear this is going to be a mess of a committee.

      The next two games will be big for each of them to carve out a significant role.

      VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
      Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
      • Hendrix says:

        I have always preferred Ridley to Vereen. I see Ridley as more of a BJGE type back and Vereen as a Kevin Faulk type back. For long term I think Ridley is the best bet IMO

        VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
        Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
  2. hosler427 says:

    I watched the Pats/Jags game. Ridley looked very average I thought. He showed some nice versatility but to me appears to be a typical NE swiss army knife player. Also…He didn’t get in the endzone for his first TD IMO.

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
  3. Ken says:

    Taylor Price worth a stash in a deep keeper league?

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
    • DLF_KenK says:

      A deep dynasty league, yes. A deep keeper league, maybe. He’s still pretty far down the depth chart.

      VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
      Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
  4. tstafford says:

    Like most, I watched the ESPN game (SDC/SEA). I’m very concerned that Mathews is going to have limited value in 2011. Serves as a good reminder about how talent overcomes situation (or vice versa). Mathews went so high last year because of the situation but now Tolbert has pulled even because Mathews just isn’t all that. Daniel Thomas fans should take heed.

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. Y. O. P. P. says:

    I think ridleys performance is more an indictment on how shallow the talent pool is on jacksonville defense than anything else. The sheep will flock on the bandwagon after a few preseason plays. Do not be fooled just pick up the players previously deemed rosterable that did not play because they are already higher on the depth chart and had the night off those are guys the sheep drop to reach for these preseason flashes in the pan.

    That is smart managing

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: +1 (from 3 votes)
    • DLF_KenK says:

      I would echo those sentiments and even take it one step further. For the first two weeks of the preseason, you’re likely looking for more red flags than anything else.

      Had Ridley NOT looked good last night with that many touches against Jacksonville backups, it would have been concerning. The fact he did just reinforces his status as a decent rookie pickup.

      VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
      Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  6. kris_kapsner says:

    Though I know it was just the first preseason game and we can’t suddenly fall in love with a player just based on that. But, when I look at the RB situation in New England, I see a RB rotation that is not set yet. We all knew that the Pats needed to upgrade their running backs. So, Vereen going in the 2nd immediately made him a very interesting rookie to pick up.

    But, let me ask this.

    Hypothetically, if the Pats had picked some defensive player in the 2nd round instead of Vereen and the first RB they selected was Ridley, how much higher would he be in our rankings? Would he be a late 1st round pick like Vereen is now? Very possibly.

    Now, I like Vereen quite a bit still. But, because of the uncertainty of the RB situation in New England, I wouldn’t just pass this game off as an anomaly. I wouldn’t rush out and trade a 1st round pick for him. But, if I had room, I’d certainly look at trading a 2nd right now for him. He’s definitely worth a roster spot right now.

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  7. ??droppedballs?? says:

    why no talk about portis the qb for sea, i was more impressed with his play then anyother person out of the 1st preseason games

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Comment