
No, it’s not over technically over yet, but I’ve seen enough in order to produce my first post-combine ranking list.
The 2011 NFL combine produced some quality results. Enough so that I am a bit more optimistic in an area or two than I was prior to this weekend. Overall, I believe(d) this draft is well below some of the quality drafts in the last ten years. In certain areas, most notably in the quarterback and running back positions, I had very limited optimism for the quality of depth beyond one or two players. In broad terms, I still have this opinion, but the running back position does hold a bit more intrigue for me. But I stand by my opinion that it is still a position wrought with risk in the top tiers.
To balance my rise in optimism for the running backs, I found myself largely unimpressed by a majority of the receivers. Much like both the running back and quarterback positions, there are few clear-cut names to target outside the obvious few. While this is not a good situation if you have a first round draft pick in the 4-8 range, it does provide plenty of opportunity outside of this range as it will be hard to slot many of the rookies. I’ll do my best here to help you with the initial rankings.
I was pleasantly surprised to see most of the rookies work out Sunday and not pull-out of drills. With the exception of Blaine Gabbert (who did run the 40) and Daniel Thomas, all higher profile players worked out. RBs Taiwan Jones and Noel Devine are the only other notables that failed to participate.
Quarterbacks
It was good to see most of the big names take part. More than at any other time (lacking further research) it’s safe to say that this is the fastest QB class in the past decade or two. Whether players at this position are just getting faster or by anomaly, this year’s class is nothing short of exceptional in that regard.
In short to intermediate routes, I was impressed with how most could spin it. Velocity and quality were better than average. Longer routes were disappointing and there seemed to be a lack of “touch” present. This may have much to do with the lack of chemistry with the receivers but it was notably weak compared to previous years in my estimation. Footwork and mechanics were fair and that may be a stretch.
Rather than bore you with numbers you can readily find on any football site, I’ll get to my rankings. I will post the players’ 40 times following their name. In order, here are my initial rankings, along with a short note on each:
1. Cam Newton (4.59) – He’s just too intriguing of a prospect to list below Gabbert. He comes with a large head, but if controlled, that can serve him well. He was high on many of his short passes and a bit erratic, but he made up for it with speed, jumping ability and a relatively good interview in front of the the NFL Network cast.
2. Blaine Gabbert (4.62) – Gabbert looks the part, seems to be a good kid and is a relatively safe choice for NFL teams. He’s not elite in my book, but has enough tangible and intangible balance that a good system and coach should be able to mold him into a passable NFL quarterback. He reminds me a lot of Matthew Stafford.
3. Ryan Mallett (5.10) – Mallett as my #3 is a tough decision. I don’t like character issues and baggage, especially in my quarterbacks. But little has been proven about Mallett and he throws a nice ball, has great size and seems to have the ability to lead. He comes with great risk and that Ryan Leaf comparison will dog him until he’s able to disprove it on the field over time. Beware adversity in Mallett, he doesn’t respond well.
4. Colin Kaepernick (4.43) – Kaepernick is an intriguing prospect. He’s got a rifle for an arm, is tall, agile and can make every throw seemingly with ease. I was very impressed by most every part of his workout, save his mechanics. He looks sloppy and disjointed when throwing the ball and is not compact. A good QB coach will go a long way to making his release a single motion and improving his footwork. I came very close to rating Kaepernick as my #3 QB on upside alone.
5. Jake Locker (4.50) – Locker is a rough stone. Polishing will take time but it’s obvious that he has the athleticism and the arm to make for a solid foundation. Whether or not his decision making and accuracy can be improved will only be determined over time. The bigger issue for me is his looming baseball career and his elusive answers as to his commitment to football. To me, this speaks volumes about his mental awareness about what baseball could offer if he doesn’t go highly in the draft or to a good situation. GMs and coaches will be highly suspect of his commitment as well on draft day.
6. Christian Ponder (4.85) – Ponder really stood out at the combine and I, multiple times, had to ask myself “who was that?” – having been conditioned to look for Newton, Mallett and Locker. Ponder isn’t a huge presence in the backfield but he perhaps had the best combine of any passer on Sunday.
7. Ricky Stanzi (4.81) - Not a great showing for Stanzi. He’s a late round prospect.
8. Andy Dalton (4.96) – See Ricky Stanzi.
Running Backs
As I’ve said before, I’m not high on this RB class. But during this combine, I’m more intrigued than I was. This is not to say that I’d be excited to have pick #3, #4 or #5 to be able to take the next RB off the board, but there is potential from some of the backs that will be selected in fantasy drafts beyond pick five. Looking out five years, I would not be surprised to see a back taken beyond pick ten in fantasy be the top back out of this class.
1. Mark Ingram (4.62) – I am disappointed by his time considering his lost weight, but it shouldn’t affect his top billing status. Ingram also measured in less than ideal in my book but looked strong, agile and determined in drills. He’s got good hips, balance and I like how he runs under control and loose below the waste. Likely to be your #1 pick in fantasy unless you are in a PPR system and in need of a WR.
2. Mikel Leshoure (4.59) – For a back of Leshoure’s size, 4.59 is a nice time. He looked heavier than his 230 lbs. and didn’t appear to be in top condition, but you can tell what he brings to the table and there is no mistaking his power and style. He also demonstrated more agility than I expected. Leshoure has a contingent of people that believe he should be the first off the board at RB, and it’s not hard to see why, especially considering his faster 40 time. If you like Mendenhall, you’re looking at much the same runner in Leshoure.
3. Ryan Williams (4.61) – Williams also disappointed me with his time and I’m having a hard time keeping him at his current ranking. Williams can be a dynamic runner and without the injury tag, could be the top prospect in this year’s draft. But his slow 40 and relatively small hands could see him slide well into the late 2nd round.
4. Shane Vereen (4.50) – Vereen showed up big at the combine and likely raised his draft stock a good measure. Earlier in the week, Vereen measured in at just over 5’10″ and a good looking 210 pounds. He then, later, pushed up the 225 pound bench press an impressive 31 times. Then, on Sunday, he ran a 4.50 40 and looked natural plucking the ball in receiving drills. I could very easily make a case for Vereen moving up to #3, and he may in my final list.
5. Roy Helu, Jr. (4.42) – Much like Vereen at #4, Helu raised his stock on Sunday. He impressed me with a much faster 40 time than expected and displayed impressive size/bulk as well as better than average results in individual drills. He looks a bit stiff in the hips to me at I’m going to need to watch more tape on him before my final rankings, but he’s done enough to crack the top 5. He reminds me a bit of Ben Tate and Kolby Smith in that he isn’t great in any one area, but is good in most.
6. DeMarco Murray (4.41) – Murray is an enigma and I just don’t know what to expect from him at the next level. He turned in a nice 40 time and displayed greater bulk than I expected at nearly 6′ tall. He’s a wild card a bit like Jamal Charles and reminds me a lot of him.
7. Kendall Hunter (4.53) – There’s a lot I like about Hunter. He doesn’t run “small” and he has the look of a starting RB. Those of you that know my ranking system know that size figures prominently as smaller productive fantasy backs are the exception, not the norm. At 5’7″, he’s not going to make many compare him to Ray Rice, but he has the same toughness. His style reminds me a lot of Javon Ringer.
8. Taiwan Jones (DNP) – I was disappointed to see Jones pull out of drills. I was very interested in seeing him run. Until then, I’m keeping him in my top 10 as an intriguing prospect.
9. Da’Rel Scott (4.34) – Any back that can run a 4.34 at 5’11″/211 lbs. gets my attention. And the rest of his drills were somewhat eye opening, whether due to the fact that he wasn’t really on my radar or because he stood out – both are true. More research is needed before moving him up or down on my list. I can’t help but get the image of Chris Henry (RB) out of my mind.
10. Daniel Thomas (DNP) – Slipping mightily and I won’t rank him higher until I see more of him.
Wide Receivers
When Blackmon and Floyd decided to return to school, much of my excitement for the 2011 draft went with them. I really believed that those two names, when combined with Green and Jones, would have made for one of the most dynamic first round receiver drafts in many, many years. As it stands, it’s likely that Green and Jones will be the only first round receivers taken, unless Torrey Smith can sneak into the bottom of round one.
Much like the running backs, the drop-off in receiver talent after the top two is a steep one. What remains will be a roll of the dice, perhaps allowing you to score a productive player much later than would otherwise be possible.
1. A.J. Green (4.50) – Green didn’t help himself during the combine, nor did he hurt himself. Green is what Green is, a dynamic down-field receiver that has the heart and motor needed to be successful at the NFL level. I was disappointed with Green’s displayed leaping ability (34″) and fully expected him to jump 38″+ but this won’t hurt his draft stock. He’s a natural and pure threat at receiver and he’ll be the top WR off the board in all but Alabama.
2. Julio Jones (4.39) – The only thing Jones didn’t display this past weekend was a cape. Jones jumped 11’3″ in the broad jump, 38.5″ in the vertical and ran a 4.39 in the 40. Oh yeah, and he did it with a broken foot. It was a ridiculous performance. He doesn’t have the hands that Green has, but he’s 1b to Green’s 1a status.
3. Torrey Smith (4.43) – I’ve soured on him just a bit since before the combine. He can get deep and does have good bulk for his size, but I’m not seeing the dynamic I normally like in my WRs. After watching his gauntlet drill I was struck by the pace at which he wasn’t running, leading me to believe that he didn’t trust his hands as he should. After seeing numerous twitter posts about how fast he was in the drill, I watched again and don’t know what these individuals were looking at. He was slower and deliberate in the drill. Still, he has plenty of upside and is the best receiver in the class at his size.
4. Leonard Hankerson (4.43) – At 10 5/8″, Hankerson had the biggest hands on the field in the receiver group. I was pleasantly surprised at his 40 time, expecting a dash in the low 4.5s. On the down side, I was unimpressed at his 34″ vertical jump, expecting that he would be perhaps the best leaper in the class. He’s raw, but physical and plucks the ball very well. Hankerson has a lot of upside and comes from a great program for NFL success.
5. Jonathan Baldwin (4.50) – Baldwin held his ground well during the combine. Running faster than expected at 4.50, the speed answers the main question that remained for me. Baldwin is a bit stiff as larger receivers tend to be, but was fluid. Baldwin’s strength won’t be in speed-out routes and should make his living in getting vertical but as a big target, he will pull down many balls in the intermediate passing game.
6. Tandon Doss (DNP) – Big receiver, big hands and NFL upside. He should be in the 4.5s in the 40 and is a late 2nd round fantasy selection.
7. Greg Little (4.53) – A big, physical, and intimidating receiver, Little was able to put up 27 reps on the 225 lb. bench press. He’s raw and sat out his final year at North Carolina but I like his toughness and physicality and believe he could have Boldin style ability. His smaller hands are a bit of a concern.
8. Titus Young (4.53) – I’m not as high on Young as many others are. Called a poor man’s DeSean Jackson, Young failed to impress with his 40 time, something a slight receiver can’t afford to do. He can be dynamic but he’s hard to draft highly.
9. Edmund Gates (4.37) – Gates will likely be moving ahead of Titus Young in my next ranking list. He reminds me much more of DeSean Jackson that does the aforementioned Young. Don’t sleep on Gates though because he also has a NFL body.
10. Jimmy Young (4.55) – A major project, I liked what I saw out of Young at the combine. He had a dynamic that was unmistakable and had an “it” factor that I normally look for in my receivers. Other receivers that have had this same level of “it” have been Greg Jennings, Jordan Shipley and DeSean Jackson.
Tight Ends
An uninspiring group of tight ends in 2011 in my estimation. Perhaps one to be selected in the 2nd round of most fantasy drafts.
1. D.J. Williams (4.67) - Under sized but I like his fluidity and his route running. Dustin Keller anyone?
2. Virgil Green (4.64) – I love this kid’s drive, dynamic and size. He’s going to be a surprise at the next level
3. Lance Kendricks (4.75)
4. Luke Stocker (4.79)
5. Kyle Rudolph (DNP) -








Cam Newton had a horrible combine and supposedly also came off very bad in team interviews. He has “bust” written all over him.
Leonard Hankerson has suspect hands and showed that at the combine. Edmund Gates is not NFL ready and only has straight-line speed so I don’t see how you can move him ahead of Titus Young who can play the game much better.
You mentioned Leshoure running a 4.95 but you have his correct 40 time next to his name.
Thanks for the note on Leshoure, I’ll fix that. Not a big fan of Titus Young and living in the NW, have seen a fair amount of him. Have to do more research on Gates.
Hankerson’s hands aren’t elite by any stretch but he was on par with expectations in that regard.
Newton’s combine was not great, that’s for sure … far from. But he’s a very dynamic player and no doubt he was pressing. His team interviews are of great concerns and I fear for him if he isn’t successful quickly. But make not mistake, the misinformation train is at full speed for all top end prospects. Newton is far more dynamic than any of the other passers and a team will take a chance early on him.
The Ponder news about him rising is to likely to lure many of the teams at the top of the first round to consider the possibility of waiting until the second to get their QB .. thus allowing Newton to fall. That said, I think Ponder has a high ceiling.
Thanks for the comments
How is Kyle Rudolph not ranked at TE?
I don’t think Hankerson has issues with his hands. He has issues with concentration which many scouts have brought up. That was evident in the gauntlet drill. After he dropped that first pass, he lost focus and was out of it.
I don’t agree with your rankings but appreciate the posting. I think in general, people are putting too much stock on what they saw these guys do in their underwear.
Thanks for the note … I just realized that I left off my 5th TE, which happens to be Rudolph. Not excited about the class at all and Rudolph was my #4. Feel free to post the difference that you have as well … I take no offense.
I also completely agree that people put too much emphasis on what players do at the combine, but there are many things that can be taken from it too.
There is a lot of differences. Rudolph reminds me a lot of Gronkowski and is the #1 TE IMO.
I have been high on Greg Little for a long time. He is a natural athlete. He plays big when the situation calls for it and plays like a running back when it is needed. Despite being raw I have him ranked as the #4 WR. You bring up his small hands as a concern…9 1/8 isn’t freaksih small. Those same concerns as well as a limited skill set (in my opinion) should apply to Torrey Smith and his Brandon LaFell-ish 8 5/8 inch hands lol
I am also a big believer in Jacquizz Rodgers as a top 5 RB. His height doesn’t effect his play and when you see a guy that short built like that and as quick and strong as he is…he will be a factor in the NFL.
Another couple omissions are Randall Cobb and Ronald Johnson. Both are extremely underrated.
Long story short, we have very different rankings. There is nothing wrong with that though!
Remember though that we are talking about fantasy impact over NFL impact here. I believe someone like Quizz could carve out a space in the NFL, but I just don’t see him making a fantasy impact. The odds are very much stacked against him in the NFL and he doesn’t have the bulk to make up for it. Being up here in the NW, I’ve a lot of Quizz. I love him in the college game but that’s about it.
If you recall further back, Ken Simonton, who also played for the Beavers was a phenomenal but small back. I thought he had a chance at 5’7″ and 200 lbs. But he didn’t even get anything more than a sniff in the NFL and he was a better NFL style back in my opinion.
Greg Hill is probably going to rise on my board after I do more research and I think Smith is going to fall a bit. Hand size alone doesn’t affect my rankings much unless there’s been a display of drops and small hands become more of an issue as the player’s size increases and agility decreases. Small hands on larger receivers that can’t square up as effectively or turn become a problem. More agile receivers with good hips and agility can turn on balls easier and square up to make the catch. Hill’s hands combined with his bulk and size are a concern for me.
I have Randall Cobb as a late add but I have very little info on him and I don’t like to slot WRs that I don’t have some familiarity with.
Thanks for the comments!
I’m glad I’m not the only person excited to see Vereen at the next level.
The interesting thing I’m seeing in this class is the difficulty of nailing down who the #3 WR or #2 RB is. Everyone has their personal favorites. I personally like Leshoure and Williams as the #2 and #3 RB’s right now and I like Baldwin as my #3 WR. All of those 6 could be stars in the NFL.
My dark horse with super star potential is Greg Little. I think the guy has tremendous upside in the NFL. And, I plan on drafting him with my #10 or #11 pick that I have. Nicks and Tate both rolled out of that same school in recent years. Little looks like he could almost follow in Nicks’ footsteps. Yes, I know those are big words.
Vereen and Little will both be very good in the NFL. Right now I have Hankerson as my #3 WR (with Little at #4) at this time and Vereen and LeShoure as my #2 and 3 RBs. I am finding it easier to put these guys in tiers right now and let the situations shake out the rankings.
Hankerson looked horrible in the gaunlet. Hankerson got hit by every pass in the gaunlet that was thrown while running and caught one (at least I’m pretty sure he did catch one… he might have caught none). He has small hands that looked like they were made of stone. The passes he didn’t catch were good since they all hit him when he failed to catch them.
Gates has great straightline speed, but he wasn’t running anywhere near that fast in the drills. I also noted that Gates might have a little DeSean in him, but then I saw the pass catching drills where he wasn’t running anywhere near that fast. Even the announcers on the NFL network broadcast questioned where his speed went when it came to the drills.
Hankerson has the largest hands of any WR at the combine. Like I said above the big hit on him was concentration which fits what happened in the gauntlet. Watch him on the field and he makes plays…
I agree that Gates shouldn’t be sniffing any top 10 list though
I disagree about Hankerson. And he doesn’t have small hands. That said, not everyone at the combine is going to do well. Hankerson was “okay” to a bit disappointing. But game day tape is always more important to me and he plays much better than he performed .. .a bit like Newton.
I agree about Gates. He’s a wild card to me and history shows that most of these WRs are going to be busts. I think that ratio will be higher with this draft class in the WR position.
I’ll take your word on Hankerson’s hand size because I honestly didn’t bother to check it. He did catch the deep pass over the outside shoulder well. I’m not saying that the kid is trash, but he’s definitly not ahead of Baldwin on my board. Hankerson looked like the stereo-typical unathletic kid losing a game of dodgeball as he got pummeled by footballs, when he was supposed to be catching the ball. The gauntlet is designed to show flaws in a players game and no one showed more flaws then Hankerson.
Newton was erratic and definitly not my #1 QB. I don’t care how fast he runs, how high he jumps, how far he can jump from a standing position. Accuratly throwing the ball is much more important to me then being an athlete. Mallet looked better then Newton when it came to being a QB and doing QB things to me. Both have red flags, so I’ll default to the red flags of the guy who throws the ball better.
I also kept saying who’s that kid and rewinding just to see Ponder the one who threw the pass, so I totally agree with you on that. Ponder did very well.
I think Baldwin will end up my #3 when it’s all said and done.
Accuracy is one of the reasons Newton will be my #1 QB. His on-field accuracy this past year was a staggering 66%+. Accuracy is my top stat for rankings and why Locker can’t be much higher than he is. In most all cases, accuracy is a good determinant of better success. I would like to see Newton with more years of play with increasing accuracy but that 66%+ completion % is in a down field passing offense as well, not a dink and dunk offense. Combine wise, some players just tend to press and there is no chemistry with receivers. His out passes were high though.
Ponder is going to be interesting, just have to see where he goes. I’m still not sold but he’s been on my list from the beginning. I’m doing more research on Gabbert too.
“Hankerson looked like the stereo-typical unathletic kid losing a game of dodgeball as he got pummeled by footballs, when he was supposed to be catching the ball.”
That is one of the funniest things I’ve read in a long time.