Already well into the new fantasy season, rookie drafts are well under way and coaches everywhere are bristling with excitement as visions of a 2010 championship on the backs of their new rookie additions.
But in scanning recent rookie drafts, outside of the consensus top two picks of Ryan Mathews and Dez Bryant, a decision looms if you’re sitting in the three hole. Do you make the seemingly easy choice of selecting the first RB off the board in C.J. Spiller or do you go against the grain and take the dynamic Jahvid Best. While there are many similarities between these two backs, there are also some notable differences that must be weighed before making your choices.
Let’s take a look at these undersized, yet versatile, backs.
Size
Spiller – 5’10 5/8″, 196
Best – 5’10 1/8″, 199
We’re going to call this one even. While Spiller is a 1/2″ taller, Best carries a slightly thicker frame. The eyeball test during the combine favored Best as well as I was left very impressed, noting that I thought he was going to come in closer to 205. Given that Spiller is no slouch in this area as well, I’m comfortable calling this measurable a dead heat.
On the topic of size, note that my ideal RB size 5’10 1/2″ – 5’11 1/2″ and 212-221 lbs. A bit picky? …yes, but I have come to settle on this range after many years of research and statistical study for just this purpose of draft day comparison. RBs below this size have a significantly more difficult time having the desired impact in the NFL, especially as it relates to fantasy. This is not to say that they cannot be successful or that there aren’t exceptions to every rule, but both Spiller and Best fail the first test of size.
Advantage: Push
Speed
Spiller – 4.37
Best – 4.35
Our comparison doesn’t get much clearer as both are pure burners in the 40. When watching tape, they both play as fast as advertised.
When breaking it down a bit further, Spiller seems to have the better start/stop ability while Best uses his speed along with a better-than-expected physicality in his runs. Change of direction and acceleration can be important, especially in smaller backs but I prefer to see a stronger inside game matched with dynamic speed. While both have dynamic speed, Best is clearly the stronger runner which translates better to the NFL. This is not to say that Spiller isn’t a tough back, but he does not run with the same physicality as does Best. Neither are accomplished inside runners, but Best displays more ability.
Slight Advantage: Best
Situation
Spiller – Buffalo (Pick #9)
Best – Detroit (Pick #30)
Buffalo and Detroit. Yeesh. Neither are great landing spots for any RB. Both teams are solidly under-performing, have questionable offensive lines, QB play and relatively new coaching staffs.
In Buffalo’s case, a serious lack of WR talent and a significant question mark in QB play casts a heavy shadow over the expected offensive performance in 2010. Toss in the fact that capable and newly anointed starter, Fred Jackson is already sharing time with Marshawn Lynch and Spiller finds himself surrounded by significant talent in the backfield. However, Lynch is blazing a trail out of Buffalo on a series of off-the-field infractions and the 29 year old Fred Jackson lacks the dynamic ability that Spiller brings. Spiller is sure to see significant time in the return game initially and probably 8-12 touches in other phases as well. Lynch should be out of town by the pre-season and no later than next training camp. The recent events in Seattle would seemingly be the perfect set of circumstances for Lynch if Buffalo doesn’t, again, overplay their hand.
In Detroit, with a second year coach, 2nd year QB and Calvin Johnson, many are starting come out from underneath their game-day paper bags with high hopes for 2010. Incumbent RB Kevin Smith is coming back from a knee injury and is certain to give way to Jahvid Best, at least at the beginning of the season. The two backs have very disparate running styles and abilities and would seemingly be good complements for one another. Regardless, Best is your starter in DET and he’ll have every opportunity to win the job for the long haul. That said, DET’s questionable offensive line may not be much better than last year which may not bode well for Matt Stafford or their running game. Best does offer something that the Lions have not had in a long time … a dynamic speed back with great hands.
Advantage: Best
Durability
The great equalizer. Spiller is without a doubt the more durable of the two without having played a single down in the NFL. Generally, due to size, smaller backs do tend to wear down under the heavy load of the NFL. Neither of these backs have the body or the body of work to suggest that they could carry a full load without adding weight. But the horrific concussion that took much of Best’s final season at Cal is a serious concern. Due to his size and running style, further concussions are a possibility. Due to the severity of his last concussion, it is uncertain as to what another one would do to his physical health or even his running style. It is not out of the question that another serious concussion could end his career. Unlikely? Perhaps, but not out of the question.
Advantage: Spiller
Character
No concerns for either back. Both have a good motor and the work ethic to succeed at the next level.
Advantage: Push
Production
Spiller – 216/1,212/12
Best – 141/867/12
Both backs played in legitimate conferences and performed well. Not surprisingly, both backs also had largely similar numbers when extrapolating Best’s lost games due to injury, in both rushing and receiving roles. Spiller does avg. half again more yards with each reception, but not enough to swing the balance. Best marginally bests (no pun intended) Spiller on ypc.
Without getting into too much detail in calling this push, we’ll just do so.
Advantage: Push
CONCLUSION
Both Spiller and Best measure up equally in many ways as noted by the above scorecard. In many more ways, they have similar games, style and project to the NFL much in the same way. While not prototypical in size, both possess that speed dynamic that simply dictates that you cannot simply ignore either of them based on size alone.
When comparing backs that measure up so similarly, it helps to break them down to the single biggest pro AND con that each back possesses. Doing so gives us the following:
Spiller:
Pro – Speed Dynamic
Con – Situation
Best:
Pro – Speed Dynamic
Con – Injury History
We can see that the speed dynamic of both backs cancel each other out, leaving us to compare Spiller’s negative “situation” vs. that of Best’s “injury history”.
In my book, both are of equal talent level and that strikes a strong chord as I can now toss out drafted slot (#9 vs. #30). While Fred Jackson is 29 years old and Lynch is sure to be out of Buffalo soon, Spiller’s drafted situation is a much worse known quantity than the potentiality of a similar injury to Best. Detroit’s offense is more established, has legitimate weapons and plays in a dome while Buffalo is struggling mightily with their offensive line , QB play and unproven WRs. Additionally, the late season weather in Buffalo is well regarded in fantasy as one to avoid if at all possible.
Come draft day, if I’m sitting with the third pick, I’ll be taking Jahvid Best without much further consideration … and that paper bag can once again be used for my lunch instead of a game day statement.












cj spiller all the way
I’ve got Best #2 in the draft (Mathews, Best, Bryant), I’ma big Jim Schwartz fan and I think Buffalo is a train wreck.
Great analysis! Detroit has the most upside not only with Best but with the other key players on the team. Perhaps just one more year away from a winning season depending on this years line.
I think the only other comparison you would want to consider is ‘Long Term Value’ or something along those lines. Spiller’s value is limited by the current situation but one or two tears from now – the team will probably add new QB, WR etc…
Just a thought
Great breakdown of what any seasoned FF Team Owner should instinctively know. Best is “best” mostly because of the situation even if Spiller were to edge him out of a few categories. You can’t draft players based on potential injury concerns.
I had the same thought as Ken Haworth above. Given that we’re all about the dynasty format here, I can only assume that the author’s conclusion applies to the long term. I have no doubt that Best is the better bet to produce in 2010, but this is the first place I’ve seen him graded ahead of Spiller in terms of keeper value. Since Best is not only in a better current situation, but the core of that “situation” is also made up of young players on the rise, I guess it makes sense.
I disagree about the production being a push. CJ Spiller did it for 4 years in college without major injury and J. Best had the great 2008 and was having a great 2009 until the injury. Athought Best’s production was better, he only did a 1-1/2. I think CJ SPiller is extremely talented and a safer pick long term.
so are you implying that having the 4th pick in dyansty league that Spiller should go 4th?, that is where i am sitting this year. i figure our draft will go matthews/bryant or vice versa, then it gets murky, you get choices like Best, Spiller{speed guys} Tate and Hardesty{more power type} or does one of the QB’s come into play, the other recievers are more second round and beyond players. i do like Bests’ situation much better, but he gets hurt alot. would it be too much of a reach to take Tate or Hardesty that early?
Having the 4th pick may be a curse or a blessing depending on how you look at it. In one sense, in believing that the first tier of this draft is 4 players deep, you don’t have to worry about who take as you take whoever falls from the group of Mathews, Bryant, Best and Spiller. But on the other hand, you don’t get to choose either if you have, say, Best ranked higher than Spiller and really want him. If you can get Best at #4, you should be thrilled, I could see him going as high as #2 rather easily.
I’d like to put Tate in that top tier and if you wanted to take Tate over a Spiller, you certainly could but I wouldn’t be able to do it myself. While I’m not a huge fan of Spiller as a full time RB, he’s going to get plenty of opportunities in multiple phases and Fred Jackson is 29. Lynch should be out of BUF before preseason. Spiller is going to get his chances.
I agree with Jeff, top 4 sits with Mathews, Dez, Best, Spiller and you take who falls. If you want Tate I’d probably trade down 1 spot as guys have been overspending to get into the top 4.
Spiller’s situation isn’t great but being a dynasty I could care less about that, I value pure talent 10x over a situation.
Remember how bad Detroit was when Calvin Johnson went there? Now all of a sudden people are all over that offense and in love with their potential in just a few years. Spiller was scoring catching passes, running, returning kicks, pretty much anytime he touched the football, you should be happy to take him at the #4 spot, and I could see someone taking him over Best too.